کاربرد شن-زئولیت-ژئوتکستایل به‌منظور کاهش نیترات فاضلاب دانشگاه شهرکرد و مقایسه کیفی آن با استانداردها

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه شهرکرد، ایران

2 دانشگاه شهرکرد، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی اب

3 گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، ایران

4 گروه کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران

چکیده

سابقه و هدف: در سیستم‌های آبیاری قطره‌ای، واکنش‌پذیری سطحی اندک فیلتر شن به منظور تصفیه فیزیکی-شیمیایی باعث شد محیط‌های فیلترکننده دیگری به کار روند که به همراه شن توانایی نگهداری آلاینده‌های فاضلاب‌ را افزایش دهند. هدف از این پژوهش اولاً بررسی مقایسه کاربرد شن و ژئوتکستایل همراه با زئولیت در فیلترها به منظور کاهش آلودگی نیترات در پساب و ثانیاً مقایسه پارامترهای کیفی پساب دانشگاه شهرکرد با استانداردهای جهانی بود.
مواد و روش‌ها: این پژوهش در سال 1394-1393 در دانشگاه شهرکرد انجام شد. فاضلاب مورد استفاده از چاهک مشاهده‌ای واقع در نزدیکی درب شرقی دانشگاه شهرکرد تهیه شد. به منظور بررسی وضعیت نیترات موجود در آن، آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها شامل تیمار شاهد Ctrl (شن بدون کاربرد زئولیت)، ژئوتکستایل بدون کاربرد زئولیت J، شن -ژئوتکستایل بدون کاربرد زئولیت SJ، شن به همراه زئولیت SZ، ژئوتکستایل به همراه زئولیت JZ و شن ژئوتکستایل به همراه زئولیت SJZ بود. تیمارها درون ستون‌های استوانه‌ای از جنس لوله‌های پی‌وی سی ریخته شد. اندازه‌گیری نیترات فاضلاب ورودی و پساب خروجی با دستگاه اسپکتروفتومتر انجام شد و بارمعلق، EC، pH، سدیم و مجموع کلسیم و منیزیم در فاضلاب ورودی تعیین و با استانداردها مقایسه شد. انجام آنالیز آماری با استفاده از نرم افزار SAS صورت گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد فیلترها بر مقدار نیترات پساب خروجی از ستون‌ها در سطح احتمال یک درصد تاثیر معنی‌داری داشت. تیمارهای JZ، SJZ و SZ به ترتیب با کاهش 57، 55 و 52 درصدی، بیشترین کاهش نیترات را نشان دادند. تیمار شن طبق انتظار تاثیری روی نیترات نداشت. اندازه‌گیری‌ها نشان داد میزان نیترات پساب دانشگاه شهرکرد جهت استفاده در آبیاری، از مقدار مجاز بعضی سازمان‌ها، کمتر بود اما مطابق استاندارد فائو برای آبیاری مناسب نبود. همچنین میزان EC (dS/m 02/1) و ذرات معلق ( mg/L 6/109) طبق اکثر استانداردها بیش از حد مجاز برای آبیاری بود. حداقل و حداکثر مقدار pH به ترتیب 2/7 و 03/8 بود که از مقدار مقدار بیشینه، تمام استاندارد ها کمتر بود. SAR اندازه گیری شده پساب ورودی به فیلترها 14/2 بود که بر اساس استانداردها از نظر کاربرد در آبیاری مجاز بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: این پژوهش نشان داد فیلتر شنی به تنهایی تأثیری بر مقدار بار معلق موجود در پساب نداشت اما کاربرد ژئوتکستایل و زئولیت در فیلترهای شنی می‌تواند سبب کاهش آلودگی نیترات ناشی از پساب شود. مقدار سدیم و مجموع کلسیم و منیزیم موجود در پساب از مقدار مجاز آن برای استفاده در آبیاری طبق استاندارد سازمان محیط زیست آمریکا بیشتر بود. اما مقدار نسبت جذبی سدیم از مقدار مجاز آن برای استفاده در آبیاری طبق تمام استانداردها کمتر بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Use of sand-zeolite-geotextile in order to reduce the nitrate in Shahrekord University wastewater and compare its quality with standards

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Shirvani Ichi 1
  • Sayyed-Hassan Tabatabaei 2
  • Mahdi Ghobadinia 3
  • Negar Nourmahnad 4
1 Former M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Water Engineering Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Department of Water Engineering,- Faculty of Agriculture- Shahrekord University, Shahrekord- Iran
3 Department of Irrigation Engineering, College of Agriculture, University of Shahrekord, Iran
4 Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and objectives: In drip irrigation systems, the low surface reactivity of the sand filter for physical-chemical treatment led to the use of other filter media that increase the retention capacity of wastewater contaminants along with the sand. The purpose of this study was firstly to compare the application of sand and geotextile with zeolite in filters to reduce nitrate pollution in wastewater and secondly to compare the quality parameters of Shahrekord University effluent with international standards.
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted at Shahrekord University in 2014-2015. The wastewater used in this project was prepared from an observation well located near the east door of Shahrekord University. In order to investigate the nitrate status, a factorial experiment was performed in a completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments include control treatment Ctrl (sand without application of zeolite), geotextile without application of zeolite J, sand-geotextile without application of zeolite SJ, sand with zeolite SZ, geotextile with zeolite JZ, and geotextile sand with zeolite. The treatments were poured into cylindrical columns made of PVC tubes. Inlet effluent nitrate and wastewater were measured with a spectrophotometer. The total suspended solid, EC, pH, sodium, calcium and magnesium in the effluent were determined and compared with the standards. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software.
Results: The results showed that the filters had a significant effect on the effluent nitrate passed from the columns (P<0.01). JZ, SJZ, and SZ treatments showed the highest nitrate reduction with 57, 55, and 52%, respectively. Sand treatment did not affect nitrate as expected. Measurements showed that the amount of nitrate in Shahrekord University effluent for irrigation was less than the allowable amount of some organizations, but was not suitable for irrigation according to the FAO standard. Also, the amount of EC (1.02 dS/m) and suspended solid (109.6 mg/L) was too much for irrigation according to most standards, but the pH and SAR of the effluent were sufficient to be used for irrigation. The minimum and maximum pH values were 7.2 and 8.03, respectively, which were lower than the maximum value of all standards. The measured SAR of the effluent entering the filters was 2.14, which was allowed according to the standards in terms of application in irrigation.
Conclusion: This study showed that sand filters alone did not affect the amount of suspended load in the effluent, but using geotextiles and zeolite in sand filters can reduce nitrate pollution from effluent. The amount of sodium, and total calcium and magnesium in the effluent was higher than the allowable amount for use in irrigation according to the standards of the US Environmental Protection Agency. But the amount of sodium absorption ratio was less than the allowable amount for use in irrigation according to all standards.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Filter
  • Irrigation
  • Pollution
  • Suspended solid
1.Ansari, A. 2003. Removal of heavy elements from aqueous solutions by Iranian natural zeolite minerals. Master Thesis. Department of agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology. 145p. (In )
2.Anshu, S., Jose, R., StepHen, B., and Workman, R. 2008. Runoff and drainage water quality from geotextile and gravel pads used in livestock feeding andloafing areas. Bioresource Technology. 99: 3224-3232.
3.Ayers, R.S., and Westcot, D.W. 1994. Water Quality for Agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage paper, 29 Rev 1. FAO. Rome, 174p.
4.Bucks D.A., and Nakayama F.S. 1980. Injection of fertilizer and other chemicals for drip irrigation. Technical conference Proceedings-Irrigation Association. Houston, Texas. USA. Silver Spring, Maryland.pp.
5.Cakmakci, T., and Sahin, U. 2021. Productivity and heavy metal pollution management in a silage maize field with reduced recycled wastewater applications with different irrigation method. J. of Environmental Management. 291: 112602.
6.Ehsangar, M., Charm, M., and Farokhiyan Firozabadi, A. 2013. Investigation of the possibility of adsorption of nitrate in Ahvaz municipal wastewater by columns of zeolite, activated carbon and sand. Iranian National Conference on Environmental Research. 31 October. Shahid Mofateh College of Hamadan. (In Persian)
7.Gedik, K., and Imamoglu, I. 2008. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions using clinoptilolite, Influence of pretreatment and regeneration. J. of Hazardous Materials. 155: 385-392.
8.Ghasemi, A.A., and Danesh, S.H. 2012. Application of Wastewater Treatment Plants’ Effluent in Agriculture and Evaluation of Potential Impacts onSoil and Crops. JWSS. 16: 61. 109-124. (In Persian)
9.Honarjoo, N., and Mardiha, A. 2019. Possibility of Applying Municipal Wastewater of Baharestan City to Remediate Saline and Sodic Soils of Margh Plain of Isfahan. J. of Geography and Environmental Planning. 30: 2. 1-15. (In Persian)
10.Jahan, I., Wood, M., Lake, C.B., and Gagnon, G.A. 2018. Using a geotextile with flocculated filter backwash
water and its impact on aluminum concentrations. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. 46: 6. 759-769.
11.Kaboosi, K. 2015. The Assessment of Medium- term Application of Treated Wastewater on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties (Case Study: Bandargaz Wastewater Treatment Plant). J. of Land Management. 2: 2. 95-110. (In Persian)
12.Mahdavi, A., Liaghat, A.M., and Sheikh Mohammadi, Y. 2011. Nitrate removal from agricultural wastewater using modified zeolite. Iranian J. of Water Research. 8: 117-124. (In Persian)
13.Malekian, R., Heidarpour, M., Mostafazadeh-Fard, B., and Abedi Koupai, J. 2008. Effect of surface and subsurface irrigation with treated wastewater on bermudagrass properties. J. of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 15: 4. 248-257. (In Persian)
14.Malekian, R., Abedi-Kuopai, J., and Eslamian, S.S. 2011. Influences of clinoptilolite and surfactant-modified Clinoptilolite zeolite on nitrate leaching and plant growth. J. of Hazardous Materials. 185: 970-976.
15.Mateju, V., Cizinska, S., Krejei, J., and Janoch, T. 1992. Biological water denitrification, a review. Enzyme Microbial Technology. 14: 170-18.
16.Ministry of Energy. 2010. Environmental criteria for the reuse of returnedwater and wastewater. pp. 135-535.(In Persian)
17.Misaelides, P. 2011. Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation, a short review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. pp. 144-15l.
18.Mohammadi, P., Siyahi, M.K., Naseri, M., Liaghat, A.M., Adl, M., Ehteshami, M., Ashrafi, A., Ghodosi, F., and Zarankabi, M.R. 2010. A review of standards and experiences of using wastewater for irrigation. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage publication. 45p. (In )
19.Naeej, O.B., Mohseni Bandpi, A., Jonidi Jafari, A., Esrafili, A., and Rezaei Kalantary, R. 2012. Removal ofNitrate from Water using Supported Zero-Valent Nano Iron on Zeolite. Iranian J. of Health and Environment.5: 3. 343-354. (In Persian)
20.Najafi, P., Mousavi, S.F., and Feizi, M. 2006. Effect of using subsurface drip in irrigation of tomato and eggplant with treated municipal wastewater. J. ofSoil and Water Sciences. 20: 1. 155-163. (In Persian)
21.National Committee for Irrigation and Drainage of Iran. 2002. Use of saline water in sustainable agriculture. Publications of the National Committee for Irrigation and Drainage of Iran, Publication Number, 69: 224. (In Persian)
22.Nazem, Z., Tabatabaei, S.H., Hosseinpur, A., Najafi, P., and Ghobadinia, M. 2021. Effect of dripand surface irrigation systems on contaminant transport in a soil affected by cracking pathway. Water andSoil Conservation. 28: 1. 219-236.
(In )
23.Oron, G. 1999. Wastewater treatment, renovation and reuse for agricultural irrigation in small communities. Agricultural Water Management.38: 223-234.
24.Pescod, M.B. 1992. Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 47, 113p.
25.President deputy strategic planning and control. 2010. Environmental criteria for the reuse of wastewater and sewage.
No 535. 155p. (In )
26.Rahimi, H., Ghobadinia, M., and Ahmadi, H. 2004. Application of geosynthetic materials as drainage under canal cover. Workshop of Drainage system under canal cover. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (IRNCID) publication. No.93: 113-134. (In )
28.Sirouspour, S., Parvizi, M., Parvin Nia, M., and Shokrollahi, A. 2017. The elimination of nitrate from urban storm runoffs by multi-filters process. Water and Soil Conservation. 24: 1. 85-101.(In Persian)
29.Soleimani, M., Ansari, A., Haj Abassi, M., and Abedi, J. 2008. Investigation of Nitrate and Ammonium Removalfrom Groundwater by Mineral Filters. 19: 3. 18-26. (In Persian)
30.Tabatabaei, S.H., and Najafi, P. 2009. Effects of irrigation with treated municipal wastewater on soil properties in arid and semi - arid regions. Irrigation and Drainage. 58: 551-560.
31.Tabatabaei, S.H., Nourmahnad, N., Kermani, S.G., Tabatabaei, S.A., Najafi, P., and Heidarpour, M. 2020. Urban wastewater reuse in agriculture for irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions-A review. International J. of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture.9: 2. 193-220. (https://dx.doi.org/ 10. 30486/ijrowa.2020.671672)
32.Tabatabaei, S.H., Mousavi, S.M., Mirlatifi, S.M., Sharifnia, R.S., and Pessarakli, M. 2017. Effects of municipal wastewater on soil chemical properties in cultivating turfgrass using subsurface drip irrigation. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 40: 8. 1133-1142. (https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1264422)
33.Wen, J., Dong, H., and Zeng, G. 2018. Application of zeolite in removing salinity/sodicity from wastewater: a review of mechanisms, challengesand opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 197: 1435-1446.