ارزیابی و مدلسازی تلفات تبخیر و باد بردگی سامانه آبیاری عقربه‌ای در منطقه مغان

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مغان، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

3 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران اردبیل – دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی - دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی- گروه آبیا

چکیده

سابقه و هدف: ارزیابی هر دستگاه آبیاری و تحلیل کارایی قابل اندازه‌گیری آن دستگاه در شرایط واقعی، یک ابزار مدیریتی است که به استفاده کننده دستگاه امکان می‌دهد تا بتواند از آنچه که در دسترس دارد به بهترین شکل ممکن استفاده نماید. ازآنجاکه نواحی مختلف ایران دارای آب‌وهوای خشک و نیمه‌خشک می‌باشد، به دست آوردن میزان واقعی تلفات تبخیر و باد بردگی و همچنین استفاده بهینه از آب، در راستای مدیریت پایدار منابع آب از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار می‌باشد. از طرفی برآورد تلفات تبخیر و باد‌بردگی توسط مدل‌های ارائه شده در شرایط اقلیمی مختلف، نتایج متفاوتی را در بر‌داشته و ارائه مدل مرجع امکان پذیر نیست، لذا هدف از این تحقیق بررسی پارامترهای موثر اقلیمی بر تلفات تبخیر و بادبردگی سامانه عقربه ای و ارائه مدلی بهینه با استفاده از رگرسیون چند متغیره در منطقه مورد مطالعه می‌باشد.
مواد و روش‌ها: این تحقیق در استان اردبیل و در شهرستان پارس آباد و در بخش شش کشت و صنعت مغان، در سرعت‌های باد 0-3،3-6 (متر بر ثانیه) و در سه تکرار انجام شد. آزمایشات بر روی دو سیستم عقربه‌ای موجود در بخش 5 و 6 کشت و صنعت مغان (1-4-6 و 1-8-6) انجام شد که دو تیمار طرح را شامل گردید. ارتفاع متوسط این منطقه از سطح دریا 32 متر می‌باشد. برای انجام آزمایش، دو ردیف قوطی با زاویه ͦ 3 نسبت به یکدیگر در مسیر شعاعی و به مرکزیت سامانه عقربه‌ای با فاصله 10 متر از هم قرار گرفتند. آبپاش بکار رفته در این تحقیق آبپاش مدل F33AS 11/64˝ با قطر پاشش 26متر بود و فشار کارکرد آبپاش‌ها در حدود 45/4 بار بود.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان‌داد راندمان سامانه در سرعت باد 0 تا 3 و 3 تا 6 به ترتیب برابر 47/89 و 47/84 درصد بوده و عوامل موثردر تلفات تبخیر و باد‌بردگی، شامل سرعت باد، درجه حرارت، رطوبت نسبی، قطر نازل و کمبود فشار بخار اشباع میباشد. بر اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده در سسامانه عقربه‌ای، عامل باد بیشترین تأثیر و کمبود فشار بخار اشباع کمترین تأثیر را بر تلفات تبخیر و باد بردگی داشته است. همچنین معادله تلفات تبخیر و بادبردگی با شرایط جوی منطقه به‌دست آمد، که دارای بهترین برازش با مقادیر اندازه‌گیری شده بود. نتایج نشان داد، اختلاف میانگین مقادیر مدل شده و مشاهداتی در سطح اعتماد یکدرصد معنیدار نمی‌باشد. علاوه بر این، میزان تلفات تبخیر و باد بردگی اندازه‌گیری شده بین 7 تا 18 درصد و مدل‌سازی شده بین 10 تا 18 درصد متغیر می‌باشد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج ارتباط مستقیم تلفات و بادبردگی را با سرعت باد در منطقه نشان داد. به‌طوری‌که در سرعت باد کمتر از 3 متر بر ثانیه پارامترهای ضریب یکنواختی، یکنواختی توزیع و راندمان‌های پتانسیل و واقعی ربع پایین در محدوده مناسبی قرارگرفته و در سرعت‌های متوسط و زیاد باد، پارامترهای ارزیابی آن در محدوده مطلوبی قرار نمی‌گیرد و این نشان‌دهنده اهمیت طراحی سامانه عقربه‌ای در مناطق باد خیز می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and Modeling Wind drift and Evaporation Losses of the Center Pivot Irrigation System in Moghan Region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yaser Hoseini 1
  • Majid Raoof 2
  • Fardin Nazari-Gigloo 3
1 Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Moghan College of Agriculture and Natural resources - University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.
3 Graduated Master of Science (MSc), Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Evaluation of irrigation systems consists of analyzing the measurable performance of the system in operation conditions, is a management tool that allows the system users to make the best use of the irrigation systems. Since various regions in Iran have arid and semi-arid climates, obtaining the actual wind drift and evaporation losses and also making optimized use of water towards sustainable water resources management has a great importance. Since estimation of evaporation and wind losses that has been presented in different climatic conditions has different results, and it is not possible to present a reference model, so the purpose of this study is to investigate the effective climatic parameters on evaporation and wind losses of the Center Pivot system and to present an optimal model using multivariate regression in the study area.
Materials and Methods: This research has been carried out in the city of Pars-Abad in Ardabil province. The study was conducted in Part of the Moghan Agro-Industrial Complex, at wind speeds of 0-3 and 3-6 meters per second with three replications. Experiments were performed on two Center Pivot Irrigation System in sections 5 and 6 of Moghan Agro-Industrial Complex (1-4-6 and 1-8-6), which included two design treatments. The average altitude of this area is 32 meters above the sea.
Results: Results indicated that the efficiencies of the system at wind speeds of 0-3, 3-6 meters per second were 89.47, 84.47 percent, respectively, and wind speed, temperature, relative humidity, nozzle diameter, and vapor pressure deficit (saturation deficit) were among the factors that influenced wind drift and evaporation losses. Base on the results, the wind factor had the most and vapor pressure deficit had the least effect on wind drift and evaporation losses. Also, the equation of wind drift and evaporation losses was also obtained with the atmospheric conditions of the region, which had the best fit with the measured values. Results shown that the difference between results of the model and observed data was not significant in 1% level of confidence. Moreover, the measured and the modeled percentages obtained for wind drift and evaporation losses varied from 7 to 18 and from 10 to 18 percent, respectively.
Conclusion: The results show a direct relationship between the evaporation and wind losses with wind speed in the region. So that at wind speeds of less than 3 m/s the parameters of Coefficient of Uniformity, Distribution Uniformity and potential and Application Efficiency of the low quarter are in the appropriate range, and at medium and high wind speeds, evaluation parameters are not in the desired range, it is indicating the importance of center pivot system design in windy regions.
Materials and Methods: This research has been carried out in the city of Pars-Abad in Ardabil province. The study was conducted in Part of the Moghan Agro-Industrial Complex Province at wind speeds of 0-3 and 3-6 meters per second with three replications. For the experiment, two rows of cans at an angle of 3 ͦ were positioned radially along the center of the centripivot system 10 m apart. The sprayer used in this study was F33AS 11/64˝ with 26 m of spraying diameter and operating pressure of the sprinklers varied from about 2 to 2.5 bars.
Results: Results indicated that the efficiencies of the system at wind speeds of 0-3, 3-6 meters per second were 89.47, 84.47 percent, respectively, and wind speed, temperature, relative humidity, nozzle diameter, and vapor pressure deficit (saturation deficit) were among the factors that influenced wind drift and evaporation losses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Efficiency
  • Multivariate Regression
  • Wind Drift and Evaporation Losses
  • Wind Speed
1.Ahmadaali, K., Ramezani, E., Hosseini Pazhouh, H., Hosseini Pazhouh, N. 2017. Assessment of modern irrigation systems in Qom province. Iran. J. Irrig. Amp. Drain. 11: 5. 736-749. (In Persian)
2.Akbari, M., and Rahimzadegan, R. 1996. Effects of Wind and Hydraulic Characteristics of Sprinkler Irrigation System on Water Distribution Uniformity. Report of the Second Congress of Water and Soil Issues. Agricultural Technical and Engineering Research Institute. Pp: 197-205. (In Persian)
3.Alizadeh, A. 2011. Design of pressure irrigation systems. Fifth Edition. Astan Ghods Razavi Publications. Pp: 197-205. 820p. (In Persian)
4.Bagheri, H., Ansari, H., and Hasheminia., SM. 2016. Modeling the Evaporation and Wind Loss of Spray Sprinklers Used in Urban Green Areas. Iran. J. Irrig. Drain. 1: 11. 83-92. (In Persian)
5.Bavi, A., Kashkuli, H.A., Boroomand,S., Naseri, A., and Albaji, M. 2009. Evaporation losses from sprinkler irrigation system under various operating conditions. J. Appl. Sci. 9: 3. 597-600.
6.Darko, R.O., Shouqi, Y., Junping, L., Haofang, Y., and Xingye, Zh. 2017. Overview of advances in improving uniformity and water use efficiency of sprinkler irrigation. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 10: 2. 1-15.
7.Dalir Hasannia, R., Nazemi, A.H., Ashraf Sadrodini, A., and Farsadizadeh, D. 2011. Model for Wind and Evaporation Loss in Centerpivot Irrigation System. J. Soil Water Sci. 21: 1. 1-14. (In Persian)
8.Dechmi, F., Playan, E., Cavero, J., Faci, J.M., and Martinez-Cob, A. 2003. Wind effects on solid set sprinkler irrigation depth and corn yield. Irrig. Sci. 22: 2. 67-77.
9.Faci, J.M., Salvador, R., Playan, E., and Sourell, H. 2001. A comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE. 127: 4. 224-233.
10.Frost, K.R., and Schwalen, H.C. 1955. Sprinkler evaporation losses, J. Agric. Engin. 36: 8. 526-528.
11.Ghaemi, A.A. 2004. Hydraulic evaluation of centrpivot irrigation system made in Iran and its technical problems. J. Agric. Engin. Res.5: 19. 27-48. (In Persian)
12.Ghanbari, S., and Nazari, B. 2016. Wind and evaporation losses in fixed classical sprinkler irrigation with movable sprinkler. International Conference on Water, Environment and Sustainable Development. Ardebil University of Mohaghegh Ardabil. Pp: 165-173. (In Persian)
13.Hamdi Ahmadabad, Y., Liaghat, AM., Sohrabi, T., Rasulzadeh, A., and Liaghat, A. 2016. Performance Evaluation of Centrpivott Irrigation Systems in Moghan Agriculture and industrial. Iran. J. Soil Water Res.4: 723-729. (In Persian)
14.Jacovides, C.P. 1997. Reply to comment on Statistical procedures for the evaluation of evapotranspiration models. Agr. Water Manage. 3: 95-97.
15.Keller, J., and Bliesner, RD. 1990. Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation. Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York Press. 566p.
16.Kiani, A.R., Shaker, M., and Tabarsa, R. 2018. Assessment of implemented sprinkler irrigation systems in Golestan province. J. Water Soil Cons.24: 6. 257-270. (In Persian)
17.Kincaid, D.C., Soloon, K.H., and Oliohant, J.C. 1996. Drop size distributions for irrigation sprinkler. Trans. ASAE. 39: 839-845.
18.Lorenzini, G., and De Wrachien, D. 2005. Performance assessment of sprinkler irrigation systems: A new indicator for spray evaporation losses. In Irrig. and Drain. 54: 295-305.
19.Markley, P., and Allen, G. 2004. Sprinkle and trickle irrigation lecture notes. 1th Ed. Utah state university, Utah, 279p.
20.Merriam, J.L., and Keller, J. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Utah State University, Logan, Utah press. 271p.
21.Molle, B., Tomas, S., Hendawi, M., and Granier, J. 2012. Evaporation and Wind Drift Losses During Sprinkler Irrigation Influenced by Droplet Size Distribution, Irrig. Drain. 61: 2. 240-250.
22.Nejati, D.B., Dinka, M.O., and Hordofa, T. 2015. Effects of Operating Pressure, Nozzle Diameter and Wind Speed on the Performance of Sprinkler in Irrigation System during Water Application. ABC J. Adv. Res. 6: 2. 149-160.
23.Ouazaa, S., Latorre, B., Burguete, J., Serreta, A., Playan, E., Salvador, R., Paniagua, P., and Zapata, N. 2015. Effect of the start – stop cycle of center-pivot towers on irrigation performance: Experiments and simulations. J. Agric. Water Manage. 147: 163-174.
24.Playan, E., Salvador, R., Faci, JM., Zapata, N., Martınez-Cob, A., and Sa´nchez, I. 2005. Day and night wind drift and evaporation losses in sprinkler solid-sets and moving laterals. J. Agric. Water Manage. 76: 139-159.
25.Rahmat Abadi, V., Boroomand Nasab, S., Sakhaierad, H., and Bavi, A. 2012. Evaporation and wind losses of two and three nozele in Classical Fixed Irrigation with Movable Sprinkler System in Ahwaz climate. Iran. J. Irrig. Drain.
4: 6. 265-272. (In Persian)
26.Ranjbar, A., Ashraf Sadrodini, A., Nazemi, A.H., Dalirehasannia, R., Fakheriefard, A. 2019. Investigation of wind and Evaporation Loss Equations in Centerpivot Irrigation System. The First International Congress and the Fourth National Congress of Irrigation and Drainage of Iran. Urmia Lake Studies Research Institute. Urmia University. Pp: 163-170. (In Persian)
27.Rostami, F. 2016. Implementation of Trimmer Model in Basht-Gachsaran Area for Classical Fixed Irrigation with Movable Sprinkler System. Master thesis. Islamic Azad University of Marvdasht. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 120p. (In Persian)
28.Salemi, H.R., and Rezvani, S.M. 2016. Technical evaluation of sprinkler irrigation system on farm (Isfahan and Hamadan Provinces. J. Water Soil Cons. 24: 3. 345-350. (In Persian)
29.Sanaei, A., Eizad-Panah, Z., and Boroumand-Nasab, S. 2015. Technical evaluation center pivot systems performed in Bardsir and Rain citys in Kerman province. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering. 38: 2. 171-180.(In Persian)
30.Sarwar, A., Peters, R.T., and Mehanna, H. 2019. Evaluating Water Application Efficiency of Low and Mid Elevation Spray Application under Changing Weather Conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 221: 84-91.
31.Shaikh Esmaeili, A. 2009. Estimation of Equation for Evaporation and Wind Losses in Classical Fixed Irrigation with Movable Sprinkler System. Iranian Water Resources Research. 5: 1. 79-81. (In Persian)
32.Sohrabi, T., and Asilmanesh, R. 1998. Performance Evaluation of centrpivot Irrigation System in Karaj. J. Soil Water Sci. 2: 2. 1-15. (In Persian)
33.Spurgeon, W.E., Thompson, T.L., and Gilley, J.R. 1983. Irrigation management using hourly spray evaporation loss estimates. ASAE. 83: 2591-2598.
34.Tarjuelo, J.M., Ortega, J.F., and Montero, J. 2000. Modeling evaporation and drift losses in irrigation with medium size impact sprinklers under semi-arid condition Agric. Water Manage. 43: 263-284.
35.Trimmer, W.L. 1987. Sprinkler evaporation losses equation. ASCE. J. Irrig. Drain. Engin. 113: 4. 616-620.
36.Yacoubi, S., Zayani, K., Zapata, N., Zairi, A., Slatni, A., Salvador, R., and Playan, E. 2010. Day and night time sprinkler irrigated tomato: Irrigation performance and crop yield. Bio systems Engineering, 10: 7. 25-35.