Stage-discharge relationship developing for multi-stage compound channels based on 1D and 2D models

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.

3 Corresponding Author, Associate Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Background and objectives
Flood is a phenomenon during which the water fills the main channel of the river and spreads on to the floodplains. In some natural rivers as well as artificial canals in cities may be more than one floodplain flank the main channel, which is called multi-stage compound channels. In these channels, when the flood occurs and the main channel is filled, the first floodplain is activated, and then when this floodplain overflows, the second floodplain is activated immediately. One of the hydraulic aspects of these channels is the stage-discharge relationship, which is used to estimate the flow discharge for any given flow depth and hence is an important tool in the river design and management during floods. In this study, the one-dimensional model of interacting divided channel and two-dimensional model of Shiono and Knight, which were previously proposed to calculate the flow discharge in classic compound channels, are developed for multi-stage compound channels.

Materials and methods
For one-dimensional model, using Newton's second law and by considering into account the apparent shear stresses at the interface of the main channel and the first flood plain, as well as the interface between first and second floodplains, a linear equation system was derived to simultaneously estimate the average flow velocities in adjacent flow compartments of these sections. Huthoff et al. equation was used for the involvement of apparent shear stresses in the interfaces. In this method, the momentum exchange coefficients were calibrated based on the laboratory data from Singh (2021) in a three-stage rectangular compound channel and using the nonlinear generalized reduced gradient optimization algorithm. To derive the semi two-dimensional model of Shiono and Knight, by depth integrating of the Navier-Stokes equations, a differential equation was obtained in terms of shear stress. Then by applying several appropriate assumptions for Reynolds stresses and secondary flows, a simple equation was obtained in terms of depth-averaged velocity. This equation was solved numerically using finite difference method.

Results
The results of the one-dimensional flow interacting model showed that this method has a good efficiency in estimating the total flow discharges with an average and maximum error of about 2.6 and 5.7 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, the vertical divided channel method which is widely used in water engineering packages, does not provide reliable results with an average error of 9.1% and a maximum error of 17.4%. The results of the numerical solution of Shiono and Knight model showed that there is a good agreement between the observed and calculated lateral velocity distributions. It was also found that the effect of eddy viscosity and secondary currents in this channel is significant and should be considered. The mean and maximum error of this model in estimating the total flow discharges was 2.4% and 4.1%, respectively.

Conclusion
The results of both one- and two-dimensional models proposed in this research showed that these models have a suitable ability to estimate the total flow discharge as well as the subdivision flow discharges in multi-stage compound channels. Investigations showed that in terms of the intensity of turbulence and the strength of the secondary currents, the interface plane between the main channel and the first floodplain is much more affected than the interface between first and second floodplains.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1.Vastilla, K. (2015). Flow–plant–sediment interactions: Vegetative resistance modeling and cohesive sediment processes. PhD thesis for School of Engineering, Aalto University.
2.Chen, G., Zhao, S., Huai, W., & Gu. S. (2019). General model for stage–discharge prediction in multi-stage compound channels. J. Hydraulic Research, 57 (4), 517-533.
3.Singh, P. K. (2021). Experimental study on the flow structure of asymmetric compound channels. PhD Dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, University of Liverpool, China.
4.Wang, W., Huai, W., & Gao, M. (2014). Numerical investigation of flow through vegetated multi-stage compound channel. J. Hydrodynamics, Ser. B. 26 (3), 467-473.
5.Singh, P. K., Tang, X., & Rahimi, H. (2023). Large-eddy simulation of compound channels with staged floodplains: flow interactions and turbulent structures. Water, 15, 983, https://doi.org/10.3390/ w15050983.
6.Ackers, P. (1992). Hydraulic design of two-stage channels. J. Water and Maritime Engineering, 96, 247-257.
7.Shiono, K., & Knight, D. W. (1991). Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. J. Fluid Mechanics, 222, 617-646.
8.Bousmar, D., & Zech, Y. (1999). Momentum transfer for practical flow computation in compound channels. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 125 (7), 696-706.
9.Devi, K., Khatua, K. K., & Khuntia, J. R. (2017). Discharge assessment in an asymmetric compound channel by zero shear interface method. ISH J. Hydraulic Engineering, 23 (2), 126-134.
10.Ervine, D. A., Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., & Sellin, R. H. J. (2000). Two-dimensional solution for straight and meandering overbank flows. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 126, 653-669.
11.Fernandes, J. N., Leal, J. B., & Cardoso, A. H. (2015). Assessment of stage–discharge predictors for compound open-channels. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 45, 62-67.
12.Huthoff, F., Roos, P. C., Augustijn, D. C. M., & Hulscher, S. J. M. H. (2008). Interacting divided channel method for compound channel flow. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 134 (8), 1158-1165.
13.Kordi, H., Amini, R., Zahiri, A., & Kordi, E. (2015). Improved Shiono and Knight method for overflow modeling. J. Hydrologic Engineering, 20 (12), 04015041.
14.Lambert, M. F., & Myers, R. C. (1998). Estimating the discharge capacity in straight compound channels. Water, Maritime and Energy, 130, 84-94.
15.Lambert, M. F., & Sellin, R. H. J. (1996). Discharge prediction in straight compound channels using the mixing length concept. J. Hydraulic Research, 34 (3), 381-394.
16.Singh, P. K., & Tang, X. (2020). Zonal and overall discharge prediction using momentum exchange in smooth and rough asymmetric compound channel flows. J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 146 (9), DOI: 10.1061/ (ASCE) IR.1943-4774.0001493.
17.Singh, P. K., Tang, X., & Rahimi, H. (2021). Linear-scale models for discharge estimation: Asymmetric compound open channel flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, DOI:10.1680/jwama.20. 00091.
18.Wark, J. B., James, C. S., & Ackers, P. (1994). Design of straight and meandering compound channels. Interim Guidelines on Hand Calculation Methodology, R & D Report 13, UK.
19.Wormleaton, P. R., & Merrett, D. J. (1990). An improved method of calculation for steady uniform flow in prismatic main channel/floodplain sections. J. Hydraulic Research, 28: 157-174.
20.Van Prooijen, B. C., Battjes, J. A., & Uijttewaal, W. S. J. (2005). Momentum exchange in straight uniform compound channel flow. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (3), 175-183.
21.Ackers, P. (1993). Flow formulae for straight two-stage channels. J. Hydraulic Research, 31 (4), 509-531.
22.Bousmar, D., Wilkin, N., Jacquemart, H., & Zech, Y. (2004). Overbank flow in symmetrically narrowing floodplains. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 130 (4), 305-312.
23.Rodi, W. (1980). Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics-A state-of-the-art. IAHR Publication, DELFT, the Netherlands.
24.Abril, J., & Knight, D. W. (2004). Stage-discharge prediction for rivers in flood applying a depth-averaged model. J. Hydraulic Research, 42, 616-629.