Application of a hierarchical multi-scale framework to delineating spatial units of watersheds (Case study: theTil-abad Watershed, Golestan Province)

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Desert Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Background and objectives: To characterize and to assess all the complexities and to develop river ecosystem management plans, it is needed that all components at different spatial and temporal scales to be considered. In this regard, a hierarchical multi­scale framework has been applied as a flexible, open­ended approach to conduct hydro-morphological assessment and also to support river basin managers through exploring the causes of hydro-morphological management problems and devising sustainable solutions. The framework has been suggested by REFORM Project (REstoringrivers FOR effective catchment Management). Generally, the hydro-morphological assessment framework and management plan cycle in river basins consists of four main steps as: 1) Delineation and characterization of spatial units; (2) Hydro-morphological assessment of past, current and future trends; 3) Identification and prioritization of pressures and 4) Developing management plan and implementing measures for restoration and rehabilitation. Based on the interim results of an ongoing PhD research program, this paper focuses on the first step in the framework for the Til-abad Watershed in Golestan Province, North of Iran.
Materials and methods: Remote sensing techniques and the GIS environment complemented by a series of field surveys, and some data and information on hydrology, climate, topography, geology and land cover, valley characteristics, and channel and floodplain morphology were utilized to divide the river system into internally consistent spatial units including bio-geographical regions, catchments, landscapes, river segments, river reaches and geomorphic units.
Results: Based on the above-mentioned methodological framework, the hierarchy of spatial units in the study area contains two units of bio-geographical region, one unit of catchment, four units of landscape, eight segments units and 26 Reach units.
Conclusion: The results of this research has important contributions to systemic hydro-morphological assessment and development of management plans in the Til-abad Watershed by increasing process understanding and by providing descriptions on the characteristics and the relationship between different spatial units. This hierarchical multi-scale framework has the applicability and generalizability to other river basins in Iran formulating the integrated assessment and management practices.
Based on the above-mentioned methodological framework, the hierarchy of spatial units in the study area contains two units of bio-geographical region, one unit of catchment, four units of landscape, eight segments units and 26 Reach units.
The results of this research has important contributions to systemic hydro-morphological assessment and development of management plans in the Til-abad Watershed by increasing process understanding and by providing descriptions on the characteristics and the relationship between different spatial units. This hierarchical multi-scale framework has the applicability and generalizability to other river basins in Iran formulating the integrated assessment and management practices.

Keywords

References

1.Alizadeh, A. 2006. Priciples applied hydrology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 19th editin. (In Persian, 283)
2.Bizzi, S., Blamauer, B., Braca, G., Bussettini, M., Camenen, B., Comiti, F., Demarchi, L., García De Jalón, D., González Del Tánago, M., Grabowski, R.C., Gurnell, M., Habersack, H., Lastoria, B., Latapie, A., Martínez-Fernández, V., Mountford, J.O., Nardi, L., O’Hare, M.T., Percopo, C., Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Weissteiner, C., and Ziliani, L. 2014. Thematic Annexes of
the Multi-scale Hierarchical Framework. D2.1 Part 2. of REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management), a Collaborative project (large-scale integrating project) funded by the European Commission within thev 7th Framework Programme under Grant Agreement 282656.
3.Blamauer, B., Camenen, B., Grabowski, R.C., Gunn, I.D.M., Gurnell, A.M., Habersack, H., Latapie, A., O’Hare,
M.T., Palma, M., Surian, N., and Ziliani, L. 2014. Catchment Case Studies: Partial Applications of the Hierarchical Multi-scale Framework. REFORM Project, Deliverable 2.1 Part 4, of REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management).
4.Blamauer, B., Belletti, B., García De Jalón, D., González Del Tánago, M., Grabowski, R., Gurnell, A.M., Habersack, H., Klösch, M., Marcinkowski, P., Martínez, V., Nardi, L., Okruszko, T., and Rinaldi, M. 2014. Catchment Case Studies: Full Applications of the Hierarchical Multi-scale Framework. Deliverable D2.1 Part 3, of REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management).
5.Boon, P.J., and Raven, P.J. 2012. Front Matter, in River Conservation and Management, John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/ 9781119961819.fmatter.
6.Brierley, G.J., and Fryirs, K.A. 2005. Geomorphology and river management: applications of the river styles framework. Blackwell, Malden.
7.Frissell, C.A., Liss, W.J., Warren, C.E., and Hurley, M.D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manage. 10: 199-214.
8.Findlay, S.J., and Taylor, M.P. 2006. Why rehabilitate urban river systems? Area. 38: 312-325.
9.Gurnell, A.M., Rinaldi, M., Belletti, B., Bizzi, S., Blamauer, B., Braca, G., Buijse, D., Bussettini, M., Camenen, B., Comiti, F., and Demarchi, L. 2016. A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management. Aquat Sci.78: 1-16.
10.Gurnell, A.M., Belletti, B., Bizzi, S., Blamauer, B., Braca, G., Buijse, A.D., Bussettini, M., Camenen, B., Comiti, F., Demarchi, L., Garcla De Jalon, D., González, Del Tánago M., Grabowski, R.C., Gunn, I.D.M., Habersack, H., Hendriks, D., Henshaw, A., Klosch, M., Lastoria, B.,  Latapie, A., Marcinkowski, P., Martinez-Fernández, V., Mosselman, E., Mountford, J.O., Nardi, L., Okruszko, T., O’Hare, M.T., Palma, M., Percopo, C., Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Weissteiner, C., and Ziliani, L. 2015.A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour. Aquatic Sciences, DOI 10.1007/s00027-015-0424-5.
11.Gurnell, A.M., Bussettini, M., Camenen, B., González Del Tánago M., Grabowski, R.C., Hendriks, D., Henshaw, A., Latapie, A., Rinaldi, M., and Surian, N. 2014. A hierarchical multi-scale framework and indicators of hydromorphological processes and forms. Deliverable 2.1, of REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management).
12.Gurnell, A.M., González Del Tánago M., Rinaldi, M., Grabowski, R.C., Henshaw, A., O’Hare, M.T., Belletti, B., and Buijse, A.D. 2015 Developmentand Application of a Multi-scale Process-Based Framework for the Hydromorphological Assessment of European Rivers. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, 3: 399-342.
13.Habersack, H.M. 2000. The river- scaling concept (RSC): a basis for ecological assessments. Hydrobiologia 422: 423. 49-60.
14.Hosseinzadeh, M.M., and Ismaili, R. 2005. Investigation of the efficiencyof Rozgen classification (Case study:
the Babylonian and Talar rivers), Sarzamin Geographical Territory,2: 110-122. (In Persian)
15.Layeqi, P., and Karam, A. 2014. Geomorphologic classification of Jajroud River by Rosgen method, Quantitative Geomorphological Researches, 3: 130-143. (In Persian)
16.Ismaili, R., and Hosseinzadeh, M.M. 2015. Comparison of Rosgen method and the River Style Framework for Mountain Rivers, A Case Study of Northern Alborz, Lavich Watershed. J. Earth Sci. Res. 6: 64-79. (In Persian)
17.Johnson, B.H., and Padmanabhan, G. 2010. Regression estimates of design flows for ungaged sites using bankfull geometry and flashiness, Catena, 81: 117-125.
18.Mainstone C.P., and Holmes, N.T.H. 2010. Embedding a strategic approach to river restoration in operational management processes - experiences in England. Aquatic Conservation of Marine Freshwater Ecosystems.
19.Makhdoum, M.F. 2014. Fundamental of Landuse Planning, Tehran University, 289p.
20.Montgomery, D.R., and Buffington, J.M. 1997. Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 109: 596-611.
21.Montgomery, D.R., and Buffington, J.M. 1998. Channel processes, classification and response potential. In: Naiman,
R.J., Bilby, R.E. (eds) River ecology and management. Springer-Verlag Inc., NewYork, Pp: 13-42.
22.Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., and Bussettini, M. 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the morphological quality index (MQI). Geomorphology 180-181: 96-108.
23.Rinaldi, M., Gurnell, A.M., González Del Tánago, M., and Bussettini, M. 2015. Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration. Aquatic Sciences.78: 17-33.
24.Roni, P., and Beechie, T. 2013. Stream and watershed restoration - A guide to restoring riverine processes and habitats. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 290p.
25.Rosgen, D. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Wildland Hydrology, 157649 U.S. Highway 160, Pagosa Springs, CO 81147.
Journal of Water and Soil Conservation
Volume 26, Issue 6
March and April 2020
Pages 1-29

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics