Effect of water table depth on evaporation from soil

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

water engineering department, university of zabol

Abstract

Background and Objectives:The relation between water table depth and evaporation rate from bare soil is of great importance in arid and semi-arid areas. In this region, due to over irrigation, the water table is very close to the ground surface which leads to salinization of the soil. Evaporation from soil columns in the presence of a water table is a important that has received great attention for many decades. The soil-drying process has been observed to occur in three recognizable stages. The first stage is evaporation with constant intensity. Secondly, evaporation is in descending order. The third stage is the residual evaporation of low intensity, which begins after excessive drying of the surface layer of the soil and its effect on reducing the hydraulic conductivity of the soil. Precise determination of evaporation from bare ground surface in semi-arid or arid regions then becomes critically important. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water table depth on the evaporation from soil surface, as well as the determination of different evaporation stages.

Materials and Methods: The soil used in this experiment was loam with a bulk density of 1.32 gr/cm3. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse and the duration was 74 days. Soils Were sived through a 2-mm mesh and then packed into the soil columns using soil funnel. The soil columns were cylindrical PVC tubes of 200 mm inside diameter. Water table was stabilized at depths of 400, 600 and 800 mm from the soil surface, and the experiment was repeated twice. For stabilizing the water table in different depths, Each soil columns contained a pipe from the botton, to supply water from bottles that maintained the water table constant. The water losses from the soil profile was measured at different depths and times using Delta-T Device Moisture Meter.
Results:The results showed that water content between 0 and 160 mm in the soil column were decrease during the experiment and close the water table depth remained saturated. In the steady-state, the rate of water loss from bottle next to the soil column is equal to the rate of evaporation from the soil surface. In a non steady-state, the rate of evaporation equals the sum of the rate of water loss from bottle and the water depleted from the soil profile. The maximum evaporation from the the water table was related to a depth of 400 mm and equal 384.6 mm and the highest water loss from the soil profile was related to a depth of 800 mm and equal 51.3 mm. By increasing the water table depth from 400 to 800 mm (increased 100%), the evaporation rate from the water table 24 percent and the total evaporation from the soil surface decreased by 16.5 percent. The length of the first stage of the evaporation for the water table depth 400 mm was 2 days and for 800 mm less than 1 day.
Conclusion: The results of this study gave us information on the flow of water above the shallow water table. Water content changes in the soil surface soil are higher than close watertable. Movement of water close water table is liquid and close the soil surface is vapor. The duration of the first stage of evaporation has decreased with increase water table depth. In general, it can be concluded that evaporation from the water table can provide a large portion of the water requirement by the plants.

Keywords


1.Alizadeh, M., and Afrasiab, P. 2016. Shallow water table management in the face cracking soil in paddy fields. J. Water Soil Cons. 22: 5. 261-274.(In Persian)
2.Babajimopoulos, C., Panoras, A., Georgoussis, H., Arampatzis, G., Hatzigiannakis, E., and Papamichail, D. 2007. Contribution to irrigation from shallow watertable under field conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 92: 3. 205-210.
3.Chari, M.M., Afrasiab, P., Piri, J., and Delbari, M. 2012. Prediction of Evaporation from Shallow Water Table Using Regression and Artificial Neural Networks. Water resource management. 8: 11-20. (In Persian)
4.Cooper, D.J., Sanderson, J.S., Stannard, D.I., and Groeneveld, D.P. 2006. Effects of long-term watertable drawdown on evapotranspiration and vegetation in an arid region phreatophyte community.J. Hydrol. 325: 21-34.
5.Gao X.Y., Huo, Z., Yining Bai, Y.,Feng, S., Huang, G., Shi, H., and Qu,Z. 2015. Soil salt and groundwater change in flood irrigation field anduncultivated land: a case study based on 4-yearfield observations. Environ. Earth Sci.73: 5. 2127-2139.
6.Gardner, W.R. 1958. Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moistureflow equation with applications to evaporation from a water table. Soil Science. 85: 228-232.
7.Gowing, J.W., Konukcu, F., and Rose, D.A. 2006. Evaporative flux from a shallow watertable: The influence of a vapour-liquid phase transition. J. Hydrol. 321: 77-89.
8.Hayek, M. 2015. An analytical model for steady vertical flux through unsaturated soils with special hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 527: 1153-1160.
9.Hillel, D. 1998. Environment to soil physics. Academic Press. New York.
10.Kahlown, M.A., et al. 2005. Effect of shallow groundwater Table on crop water requirements and crop yields. Agric. Water Manage. 76: 1. 24-35.
11.Konukcu, F., Istanbulluoglu, A., and Kocaman, I. 2004. Determination of water content in the drying soils: incorporating transition from liquid phase to vapour phase. Austr. J. Soil Res. 42: 1-8.
12.Liu, Z., Chen, H., Huo, Z., Wang,F., and Shock, C. 2016. Analysis of the contribution of groundwater to evapotranspiration in an arid irrigation district with shallow water table. Agricultural Water Management.
171: 131-141.
13.Liu, X., and Zhan, H. 2017. Calculation of steady-state evaporation for an arbitrary matric potential at bare ground surface. Water. 9: 2-15.
14.Rose, D.A. 1968. Water movement in porous materials. Part 3. Evaporation of water from soil. British J. Appl. Physic. (J. Phys. D), Series 2, 1: 1779-1791.
15.Rose, D.A., Konukcu, F., and Gowing, J.W. 2005. Effect of watertable depth on evaporation and salt accumulation above saline groundwater. Austr. J. Soil Res. 43: 565-573.
16.Selahvarzi, M., Ghahraman, B., Ansari, H., and Davari, K. 2018. Computation of Evaporation (Stages 1 and 2) from a Bare Saline Soil. J. Water Soil. 32 (2), May.-Jan. Pp: 229-237. (In Persian)
17.Sepaskhah, A.R., and Karimi-Goghari, S. 2005. Shallow groundwater contribution topistachio water use. Agric. Water Manage. 72: 69-80.
18.Savenije, H.H.G. 2004. The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary. Hydrological processes. 18: 1507-1511.
19.Warrick, A.W. 1988. Additional solutions for steady-state evaporation from a shallow water table. Soil Sci. 146: 63-66.
20.Yeh, P.J.F., and Famiglietti, J.S. 2009. Regional groundwater evapotranspiration inillinois. J. Hydrometeorol. 10: 2. 464-478.
21.Zarei, G., Homaee, M., Liaghat, A.M., and Hoorafar, A.H. 2010. A model for soil surface evaporation based on Campbll’s retention curve. J. Hydrol. 380: 356-361.