Assessing the effect of forest degradation in different slope positions on soil quality and evolution in west of Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Soil science and engineering, university of Kurdistan

2 ُSoil science and engineering, university of Kurdistan

3 Soil science and Engineering, university of Kurdistan

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Soil quality is one of the most important factors to assess soil management. Therefore, recognition of all soil quality properties such as physical, chemical and biological is essential. Forest degradation and land use change effect on soil properties variability and led to decrease soil quality factors on soil quality. Moreover, soil characteristics also are related to slope position. The region of Marivan in Kurdistan province is one of the forested areas of Zagros which in recent decades, due to population growth and the increased need for food, has been threatened and some parts are now cultivated. The aim of this research is assessing the effect of forest degradation and slope position on soil quality and evolution in west of Kurdistan Province.
Materials and Methods: Eight soil profiles in different slope position (shoulder, back slope, foot slope and toe slope) of two adjacent hill slope, under land uses of cropland and forest (uniform condition) were dug and described. Moreover, in each land use three soil samples were taken from depth 0-20 cm in each slope position. Properties of soil texture, bulk density, particle density, fine sand, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, field capacity moisture, permanent wilting point moisture, electrical conductivity, pH, carbonate calcium equivalent, total nitrogen, available phosphorous, available potash infiltration rate, microbial respiration rate, porosity, available moisture sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and erodibility were measured and computed.
Results: The results showed low slope positions (toe slope and foot slope) had higher contents of clay, organic carbon, available moisture, fine sand, silt, total nitrogen, available phosphorous, available potassium, CEC and microbial respiration rate and lower contents of electrical conductivity, soil erodibility, pH and SAR compared to high slope positions. Soils formed in low slope positions had higher depth and evolution compared to high slope positions. The results also showed two land uses (cropland and forest) in relation to bulk density, porosity, silt, clay, carbonate calcium equivalent, fine sand, pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial respiration rate, infiltration, soil erodibility and available moisture had significant difference and land use change of forest land to cropland has been led to degradation of Mollisols. Therefore, soil properties are dependent to slope position and land use kind and these factors have affected soil properties and evolution.
Conclusion: The results showed forest degradation has led to decrease of soil quality using significant decreasing of organic carbon, microbial respiration, total nitrogen, CEC, porosity, infiltration and available moisture and significant increasing of bulk density, pH, SAR, fine sand, soil erodibility, and silt. Forest degradation and land use change also due to cultivation led to decrease organic carbon content and soil structure degradation of Mollic horizon. Therefore, Mollic horizon has converted to Ochric horizon and Entisols and Inceptisols have formed in cropland land use. Moreover, the results showed different slope position effect on bulk density, sand, silt, clay, infiltration, erodibility, available water, pH, organic carbon, carbonate calcium equivalent, microbial respiration rate, nitrogen, phosphorous, CEC and potassium and have significant difference. These results show current management of studied land effect on soil quality and led to land degradation. Therefore, soil conservation of steep area using prevention of deforestation in Marivan forests and use of land based on their capability to conserve of soil and land quality is essential.

Keywords

References

1.Abu-hashim, M., Elsayed, M., and Belal, A.E. 2016. Effect of land-use changes and
site variables on surface soil organic carbon pool at Mediterranean region. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 114: 78-84.
2.Ajami, M., Khormali, F., and Ayoubi, Sh. 2009. Role of deforestation and land use change on soil erodibility of loess in eastern Golestan province. Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 94: 36-44. (In Persian)
3.Allen, K., Corre, M.D., Kurniawan, S., Utami, S.R., and Veldkamp, E. 2016. Spatial variability surpasses land-use change effects on soil biochemical properties of converted lowland landscapes in Sumatra, Indonesia. Geoderma. 284: 42-50.
4.Anderson, E., and John, P. 1982. P 831-870. Soil respiration. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Amer. Soc. of Agron, Madison USA.
5.Asghari, Sh., Hashemian Soofian, S., Goli Kalanpa, E., and Mohebodini, M. 2015.  Impacts of land use change on soil quality indicators in eastern Ardabil province. J. Soil Water Cons. 22: 3. 1-19. (In Persian)
6.Assefa, D., Rewald, B., Sanden, H., Rosinger, Ch., Abiyu, A., Yitaferu, B.L., and Godbold, D. 2017. Deforestation and land use strongly effect soil organic carbon and nitrogen stock in Northwest Ethiopia. Catena. 153: 89-99.
7.Blake, G.R., and Hartage, K.H. 1986. Bulk density, P 363-382. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part1: physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph. 9: ASA, Madison, WI.
8.Bonifacio, E., Zanini, E., Boero, V., and Franchini Angela, M. 1997. Pedogenesis in soil catena on serpentinite in north western Italy. Geoderma. 75: 33-51.
9.Bower, C.A., Reitemeier, R.F., and Fireman, M. 1952. Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci. 73: 251-262.
10.Brejda, J.J., Moorman, T.B., Karlan, D.L., and Dao, T.H. 2000. Identification of regional siol quality factors and indicators: I. Central and Southern High Plains, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
64: 2115-2124.
11.Danielson, R.E., and Sutherland, P.L. 1986. Porosity, P 443-461. In: Klute, A. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph, 9. 2nd edition, ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
12.Dotterweich, M. 2013. The history of human-induced soil erosion: geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation-a global synopsis. Geomorphology. 201: 1-34.‏
13.Fujisakia, K., Perrin, A.S., Garric, B., Balesdent, J., and Brossard, M. 2017. Soil organic carbon changes after deforestation and agrosystem establishment in Amazonia: An assessment by diachronic approach. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 245: 63-73.
14.Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis, P 383-411. In: A. Klute. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods, second edition. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI.
15.Hattar, B., Taimeh, A., and Ziadat, F. 2010. Variation in soil chemical properties along toposequences in an arid region of the Levant. Catena. 83: 34-45.
16.Henok, K., Dondeyne, S., Poesen, J., Frankl, A., and Nyssen, J. 2017. Transition from Forestbased to Cereal-based Agricultural Systems: A Review of the Drivers of Land use Change and Degradation in Southwest Ethiopia. Land Degrad. Dev. 28: 431-449.
17.Jayachandran, K., Gamare, J.S., Nair, P.R., Xavier, M., and Aggarwal, S.K. 2012. A novel biamperometric methodology for thorium determination by EDTA complexometric titration. Radiochim. Acta. 100: 311-314.
18.Jiang, P., and Thelen, K.D. 2004. Effect of soil and topographic properties on crop yield in a north- central corn-soybean cropping system. Agron J. 96: 252-258.
19.Jones, B.J. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. Boca Raton, London, New York & Washington, D.C. CRC Press.
20.Karlen, D.L., Gardner, J.C., and Rosek, M.J. 1998. A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP. J. Prod. Agric. 11: 56-60.
21.Kassa, H., Dondeyne, S., Poesen, J., Frankl, A., and Nyssen, J. 2017. Impact of deforestation on soil fertility, soil carbon and nitrogen stocks: the case of the Gacheb catchment in the White Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 247: 273-282.
22.Khaledian, Y., Kiani, F., Ebrahimi, S., and Movahedi Naeini, A. 2011. Impact of forest degradation, changing land use and building villas on some indicators of soil quality in the watershed, Golestan province. J. Soil Water Cons. 18: 3. 167-184. (In Persian)
23.Khaledian, Y., Kiani, F., Ebrahimi, S., Brevik, B.C., and Aitkenhead-Peterson, J. 2016. Assessment and monitoring of soil degradation during land use change using multivariate analysis. Land Degrad. Dev. 28: 128-141.
24.Khormali, F., Ajami, M., Ayoubi, S., Srinivasarao, Ch., and Wani, S.P. 2009. Role of deforestation and hill slope position on soil quality attributes of loess-derived soils in Golestan province, Iran. J. Agri. Ecosys. Environ. 134: 178-189.
25.Khormali, F., and Nabiollahy, K. 2009. Degradation of Mollisols in western Iran as affected by land use change. Jest. 11: 363-374.
26.Khormali, F., and Shamsi, S. 2009. Study of soil quality and micromorphology at
different sloped loess land use in the eastern of Golestan province. J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour. 16: 3. 14-29. (In Persian)
27.Kiani, F., Jalalian, A., Pashayee, A., and Khademi, H. 2007. The role of forest utilization, conservation and degradation of rangelands on soil quality indicators in Loss lands of Golestan province. Iran. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. Sci. 41: 453-463.‏ (In Persian)
28.King, G.J., Acton, D.F., and Arnaud, R.J. 1983. Soil-landscape analysis in relation to soil distribution and mapping at site witan the Weyburn association. Canadian J. Soil Sci.
63: 657-670.
29.Klute, A., and Dirksen, C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils (constant head),
P 694-696. In: Klute, A. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. Agronomy. Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
30.Li, Zh., Liu, Ch., Dong, Y., Chang, X., Nie, X., Liu, L., Xiao, H., Lu, Y., and Zenga, G. 2017. Response of soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks to soil erosion and land use types in the Loess hilly–gully region of China. Soil Tillage Res. 166: 1-9.
31.Maleki, S., Khormali, F., Kiani, F., and Karimi, A.R. 2013. Effect of slope position and aspect on some physical and chemical soil characteristics in a loess hillslope of Toshan area, Golestan province, Iran. J. Soil Water Cons. 20: 3. 93-112. (In Persian)
32.McLean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement, P 199-224. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI.
33.Nabiollahy, K., Khormali, F., and Ayoubi, Sh. 2006. Formation of Mollisols as affected by landscape position and depth of groundwater in Kharkeh research station, Kordestan province. 2006. J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour. 13: 20-30. (In Persian)
34.Nelson, D.W., and Sommers, L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter.
P 539-594. In: Page, A.L., R.H., D.R., Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI.
35.Oliveira, D.M.S., Paustian, K., Cotrufo, M.F., Fiallos, A.R., Cerqueira, A.G., and Cerri, C.E.P. 2017. Assessing labile organic carbon in soils undergoing land use change in Brazil: A comparison of approaches. Ecol.Ind. 72: 411-419.
36.Olsen, S.R., and Sommers, L. 1982. Phosohorus, P 403-430. In: AL. Page: Methods of soil analysis, Agron. No. 9, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, (ed.), Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI, USA.
37.Pajand, M.J., Emami, H., and Astaraee, A. 2016. Relationship between Topography and Some Soil Properties. J. Water Soil. 29: 6. 1699-1710. (In Persian) 
 
38.Rahimi Ashjerdi, M.R., and Ayoubi, Sh. 2013. Impacts of Land Use Change and Slope Positions on some Soil Properties and Magnetic Susceptibility in Ferydunshahr District, Isfahan province. J. Water Soil. 27: 5. 882-895. (In Persian) 
39.Ramezani, F., Jafari, S., Salavati, A., and Khalilimoghaddam, B. 2016. Study the Soil Quality Changes Indicators Using Nemoro and Integrated Quality Index Models in Some Khuzestan’s Soils. J. Water Soil. 29: 6. 1629-1639.‏ (In Persian)
40.Ramezanpour, H., and Kalbasizadeh, F. 2013. Study the effect of slope position on soil physicochemical characteristics in broad leafed forests of Lahijan area. J. Soil Res. (Soil and Water Science). 27: 3. 388-395. (In Persian)
41.Rasouli-Sadaghiani, M.H., Ghodrat, K., Ashrafi-Saeidlou, S., Jafari, M., and Khodaverdiloo, H. 2016. Evaluation of soil quality indicators in a deforested region of Northen Zagros.
J. Soil Manage. Sust. Prod. 6: 3. 83-99. (In Persian)
42.Refahi, H.Gh. 2000. Water erosion and conservation. Tehran Univerity Press, 551p.
(In Persian)
43.Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington: United States Salinity Laboratory, 160p.
44.Salehi, M.H., Jazini, F., and Mohammadkhani, A. 2008. The Effect of Topography on Soil Properties with a Focus on Yield and Quality of Almond in the Saman Area, Shahrekord.‏
J. Water Soil Plant Agric. 8: 2. 79-92. (In Persian)
45.Sewerniak, P., Jankowski, M., and Dąbrowski, M. 2017. Effect of topography and deforestation on regular variation of soils on inland dunes in the TorunBasin (N Poland). Catena. 149: 318-330.
46.Shirazi, M.A., and Boersma, L. 1984. A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture.
Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48: 142-147. (In Persian)
47.Soil and water research institute. 1377. Soil moisture and temperature regimes. Agricultural research organization, Agricultural minister.
48.Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th edn. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington.
49.Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Leoppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, G.T., and Summer, M.E. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of American Journal. Book Series No. 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, WI, USA.
50.Tesfaye, M.A., Bravo, F., Ruiz-Peinado, R., Pando, V., and Bravo-Oviedo, A. 2016. Impact of changes in land use, species and elevation on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in Ethiopian central highlands. Geoderma. 261: 70-79.
51.Tsui, C.C., Chen, Z.S., and Hsieh, C.F. 2004. Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of southern Taiwan. Geoderma. 123: 131-142.
52.Wang, Zh., Hu, Y., Wang, R., Guo, Sh., Du, L., Zhao, M., and Yao, Zh. 2017. Soil organic carbon on the fragmented Chinese Loess Plateau: Combining effects of vegetation types and topographic positions. Soil Tillage Res. 174: 1-5.
53.Wang, Zh., Wang, R., Sun, Q.,  Du, L., Zhao, M., and Hu, Y. 2017. Soil CO2 emissions from different slope gradients and positions in thesemiarid Loess Plateau of China. Ecolo. Eng. 105: 231-239.
54.Weeb, A.A., and Dowling, A.J. 2005. Characterization of basaltic clay soils (Vertisols) from the Oxford land system in central Queensland. Aust. J. Soil Res. 28: 841-856.
55.Wei, S., Zhang, X., Mclaughlin, N.B., Liang, A., Jia, S., and Chen, X. 2014. Effectof soil temperature and soil moisture on CO2 flux from eroded landscapepositions on black soil in Northeast China. Soil Tillage Res. 144: 119-125.
56.Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. In Agriculture Handbook 537, USA. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. 58p.
 57.Yaghmaeian Mahabadi, N., Khosroabadi, M., and Asadi, H. 2017. Effect of Forest Clearing and Topography on Some Soil Physicochemical Properties Effective on Soil Quality in Saravan Region, Guilan. J. Soil Res. (Soil and Water Science). 31: 2. 277-291. (In Persian)
58.Zareian, Gh. 2003. Soil genesis, classification and Land suitability evaluation in darnegon, Shiraz province. 8th soil science congress, Iran, Pp: 200-201.
59.Zhu, H., Wu, J., Guo, Sh., Huang, D., Zhu, Q., Ge, T., and Lei, T. 2014. Land use and topographic position control soil organic C and N accumulation in eroded hilly watershed of the Loess Plateau. Catena. 120: 64-72.
Journal of Water and Soil Conservation
Volume 25, Issue 2
May and June 2018
Pages 131-149

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics