Effect of Exclosure on Runoff, Sediment Concentration and Soil Loss in Erosion Plots in Khamsan Representative Watershed of Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Dept. of Watershed Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Watershed Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

3 Former Master Student, Dept. of Watershed Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

4 Assistant Prof., Dept. of Watershed Management, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

5 Expert, Natural Resources Office of Divandarreh, Divandarreh, Iran

6 Expert, Natural Resources General Office of Kurdistan Province, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

Background and objectives: Nowadays performing the watershed and rangeland management projects play the important role in water resources and soil management worldwide. Although watershed and rangeland management projects have the considerable importance as approaches to rural areas development and natural resources management, more studies have been focused on their effects on sediment and their effects on soil erosion have rarely been considered. While, knowing the integrated effectiveness of watershed and rangeland management projects is necessary for their performance analysis to achieve the project goals. The present research was therefore conducted to study the effect of exclosure on runoff volume and coefficient, sediment concentration and soil loss in erosion plots at the scale of individual rainfall events.
Materials and methods: The present study was conducted in two treated and control sub-watersheds with exclosure treatment and under grazing with area of 107.54 and 110.15 ha in southwest respectively, in Khamsan representative watershed with an area of 4337.27 ha in south of Kurdistan Province, Iran. Three plots with dimension of 22.13 × 1.83 m were installed in each western, northern and eastern slopes for the runoff volume and coefficient, sediment concentration and soil loss measurement. The exclosure treatment was operated for installed plots in treated subwatershed from 2007. Then, all the data of runoff volume and coefficient, sediment concentration and soil loss from USLE standard plots in both control and treated sub-watersheds for 52 rainfall events over the years 2009 to 2014 were measured.
Results: The results showed the significant (p≤0.05) decreasing effect of exclosure treatment on runoff volume, sediment concentration and soil loss in erosion plots at the scale of individual rainfall events. Finally, decreasing rates of 15.68, 6.13, 16.67, 24.37 and 21.43 % due to exclosure respectively for runoff volume and coefficient, sediment concentration, soil loss and sediment yield were observed. The variables of runoff volume, soil loss and sediment yield had statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) in treated and control sub-watersheds. The sediment concentration variable had p value of 0.058 and therefore the effect of exclosure treatment on sediment concentration was also significant (p≤0.06). In other words, the variables of runoff volume, sediment concentration, soil loss and sediment yield were significantly decreased in treated plots and sub-watershed due to exclosure.
Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be revealed that the exclosure treatment, because of increasing vegetation density, caused the increasing infiltration and the decreasing runoff, sediment concentration and soil loss at plot scale.

Keywords

References

1.Akbarzadeh, M. 1996. The Study of Vegitation Changes, Condition and Trend in Polor
Roodshoor Enclousures. Research Insituite of Forest and Rengelands press, 55p. (In Persian)
2.Alidoost, M., Sobeh Zahedi, Sh., and Poornasrollah, M.R. 2006. The vegitation effect on
reducing runoff and soil loss in Polrood watershed. 2th Soil and water Resources
Management and Watershed Management National Conference, 19-23 Feb. Kerman, Iran,
Pp: 1-7. (In Persian)
3.Andreasen, J.K., O’Neill, R.V., Noss, R., and Slosser, N.C. 2001. Considerations for the
development of a terrestrial index of ecological integrity. Ecological Indicators. 1: 21-35.
4.Ariapour, A., Ghermezcheshmeh, B., Nasaji, M., and Piroozi, N. 2014. Effect prediction of
rangeland condition changes on runoff by HEC-HMS model in Sarab-Sefid basin of
Borujerd. RS and GIS for Natural Resources. 4: 4. 61-78. (In Persian)
5.Busby, R.E., and Gifford, G.E. 1981. Effects of livestock grazing on infilteration and
erosion rates measured on chained and unchained pinygon-junipersites in Southeastern Utah.
J. Range Mange. 34: 400-405.
6.Eskandari, M., Dastorani, M.T., Fatahi, A., and Nasri, M. 2014. The assesment of watershed
management practices effect on flow discharge in Zaiandehrood watershed: Case of study:
Mandarjan sub-watershed. The 3th Integrated Water Resource Management, 10 and 11
September 2014, University of Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari.
(In Persian)
7.Gharehdaghi, H. 1997. The Overgrazing Effcet on Vegitation Combination in Roodshore
Region. Rengland M.Sc. Thesis, Tarbiat modares Univ. 100p. (In Persian)
8.Ghoddousi, J., Tavakoli, M., Khalkhali, S.A., and Soltani, M.J. 2006. Assessing effect of
rangeland exclusion on control and reduction of soil erosion rate and sediment yield.
Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 73: 136-142. (In Persian)
9.Goff, K.M., and Gentry, R.W. 2006. The Influence of watershed and development
characteristics on the cumulative impacts of stormwater detention ponds. J. Water Resour.
Manage. 20: 829-860.
10.Gholami, S.A. 1995. The effect of cover management (Jungle and Rengeland) on
Hydrograph Shape (reducing flood risks). Renge. Jungle J. 14: 71-85. (In Persian)
11.Gholami, L., Sadeghi, S.H.R., and Homaii, M. 2014. The effect of raice straw mulch on time
to runoff and runoff coefficient from rainfall. J. Iran Water Res. 8: 15. 33-40. (In Persian)
12.Haidarian, M., Aghakhani, A., Naghipour Borj, A., and Nasri, M. 2011. The effects of
exclosure on vegetation and soil chemical properties in Sisab rangelands, Bojnord, Iran.
J. Ren. Natur. Resour. Res. 1: 2. 14-27. (In Persian)
13.Hematzadeh, Y., Barani, H., and Kabir, A. 2009. The role of vegetation management on
surface runoff (Case study: Kechik catchment in north-east of Golestan province). J. Water
Soil Cons. 16: 2. 19-33. (In Persian)
14.Hayashi, S., Murakami, S., Xu, K., and Watanabe, M. 2008. Effect of the Three Gorges
Dam Project on flood control in Dongting lake area. China, in a 1998-type flood. J.
Hydro-Environ. Res. 2: 148-163.
15.Hoffman, G.R., and Stanley, L.D. 1978. Effect of cattle grazing on shorre vegetation of
fluctuation water level reservoirs. J. Range Manage. 31: 412-416.
16.Javadi, S.J., Baneh, Kh., Arzani, H., and Saedi, K. 2016. Effects of long-term exclosure on
soil in rangeland ecosystem using the LFA method Case study: Saral rangelands of
Kurdistan province. Iran. J. Range Des. Res. 22: 4. 821-829. (In Persian)
17.Kraaij, S., and Milton, J. 2006. Vegetation changes (1995-2004) in semiarid Karoo
shurbland, South African. J. Arid Environ. 64: 174-192.
18.Khaledi Darvishan, A., Sadeghi, S.H.R., Homaee, M., and Arabkhedri, M. 2014.
Measuring sheet erosion using synthetic color-contrast aggregates. Hydrological Processes.
28: 15. 4463-4471.
19.Kerr, J., and Chung, K. 2002. Evaluating watershed management projects. J. Water Policy.
3: 6. 537-554.
20.Kohnke, H. 1968. Soil Physics. McGraw-Hill publications in the agricultural sciences
New York, USA, 224p.
21.Lang, R. 1962. Range Seeding and Pitting Study in the Teton National Forest, Wyoming
Agric. EXPT. Sta. Mimeo. Cir, 173p.
22.Mekuria, W., Veldkamp, E., Mitiku, H., Nyssena, J., Muysd, B., and Gebrehiwota, K. 2007.
Effectiveness of exclosures to restore degraded soils as a result of overgrazing in Tigray,
Ethiopia. J. Arid Environ. 69: 270-284.
23.Mohammadpoor, K., Sadeghi, S.H.R., and Dianati Tilaki, Gh.A. 2000. The comparison of
infiltration amounts, runoff and micro topography in small plots in two rengeland treatments
of free grazing and enclosure. Soil and Water J. (Agricultural Industrial and Sciences).
24: 6. 1109-1118. (In Persian)
24.Radwan, A. 1999. Flood analysis and mitigation for an area. J. Water Resour. Manage.
5: 3. 170-177.
25.Rahmati, M., Arabkhedri, M., Jafari Ardakani, E., and Khalkhali, S.E. 2004. The effect
of grazing rate and slope on runoff and soil loss. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 62: 32-37.
(In Persian)
26.Sadeghi, S.H.R. 1996. The effect study of effectivness factors on flood and asesment of
control factors. Range. For. J. 43: 108-114. (In Persian)
27.Sadeghi, S.H.R., Sharifi F., Forootan, E., and Rezaee, M. 2004. Quantitative performance
evaluation of watershed management measures (Case study: Keshar Sub-Watershed).
Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 65: 96-102. (In Persian)
28.Salarian, F., Ghorbani, J., and Safaeian, N.A. 2013. Vegetation changes under exclosure and
livestock grazing in Chahar Bagh rangelands in Golestan province. Iran. J. Range Des. Res.
20: 1. 115-129. (In Persian)
29.Shahid, M., Gabriel, H.F., Nabi, A., Haider, S., Ali Khan, A., and Ali Shah, S.M. 2014.
Evaluation of development and land use change effects on rainfall-runoff and runoffsediment relations of catchment area of Simly lake Pakistan. Life Sci. J. 11: 3. 10-15.
30.Shahrivar, A., and Molaii, A. 2006. The study of biological and mechanical methods in
reducing sediment and runoff for rengeland (Kohgilolieh and Boirahmad). J. Water. Manage.
Soil Cons. Ins. 2: 2. 63-70. (In Persian)
31.Slayback, R.D., and Cable, D.R. 1970. Larger pits aid reseeding of semi –desert rangeland.
J. Range Manage. 23: 5. 333-335.
32.Shifang, P., Hua, F., and Changgui, W. 2008. Changes in properties and vegetation following
exclosure and grazing in degraded Alxa desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment. 124: 33-39.
33.Tavakoli, M., and Ghodoosi, J. 2001. The effect of protection management and revival in
part of “Sade Raeesali Delavari” watershed, Boosher province. Proceeding of Rangelands
and Deserts Congress of Iran, 20p. (In Persian)
34.Vallentine, J.F. 1971. Range Development and Improvements. Brigham Young University
Press, Provo, UT, 516p.
35.Vahabi, M.R. 1989. The study and comparison of vegitation changes, vegitation
combination, vegitation production and infiltration velocity in enclosure and grazing
conditions for Feridon Esfahan region. Rengelan M.Sc. Thesis Esfahan Industrial University,
100p. (In Persian)
36.Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses- A Guied to
Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook No.537, US Dept. of Agric., Washington,
D.C. 537p.
37.Wood, M., and Blackburn, E.H. 1981. Grazing systems: Their influence on infiltration in the
Rolling Plains of Texas. J. Range Manage. 34: 331-335.
38.Yong-Zhong, S., Yu-Lin, L., Jian-Yuan, C., and Wen-Zhi, Z. 2005. Influences of continuous
grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner
Mongolia, northern China. Catena. 59: 267-278.
Journal of Water and Soil Conservation
Volume 24, Issue 6
January and February 2018
Pages 243-255

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics