1.Abarca, E., Carrera, J., Sánchez-Vila, X., and Dentz, M. 2007. Anisotropic dispersive Henry
problem. Advances in Water Resources. 30: 4. 913-926.
2.Ackerer, P. 2004. A new coupling algorithm for density-driven flow in porous media.
Geophysical Research Letters. 31: 12. 12506.
3.Bear, J. 1999. Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers. Springer Science & Business Media.
4.Croucher, A.E., and O’Sullivan, M.J. 1995. The Henry Problem for Saltwater Intrusion. Water
Resources Research. 31: 7. 1809-1814.
5.Diersch, H.J. 1988. Finite element modelling of recirculating density-driven saltwater
intrusion processes in groundwater. Advances in Water Resources. 11: 1. 25-43.
6.Diersch, H.J.G., and Kolditz, O. 2002. Variable-density flow and transport in porous media:
approaches and challenges. Advances in Water Resources. 25: 8-12. 899-944.
7.Frolkovic, P. 1998. Consistent velocity approximation for density driven flow and transport.
P 603-11, In: R. Van Keer (Ed.), Advanced computational methods in engineering, Part 2.
Maastrich: Shaker Publishing.
8.Frolkovič, P., and De Schepper, H. 2001. Numerical modelling of convection dominated
transport coupled with density driven flow in porous media. Advances in Water Resources.
24: 1. 63-72.
9.Goswami, R.R., and Clement, T.P. 2007. Laboratory-scale investigation of saltwater intrusion
dynamics. Water Resources Research. 43: 4. 1-11.
10.Guo, W., and Langevin, C.D. 2002. User’s guide to SEAWAT; a computer program for
simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow.
11.Hoteit, H., Ackerer, P., Mose, R., Erhel, J., and Philippe, B. 2004. New two-dimensional
slope limiters for discontinuous Galerkin methods on arbitrary meshes. Inter. J. Num. Meth.
Engin. 61: 14. 2566-2593.
12.Huyakorn, P.S., Andersen, P.F., Mercer, J.W., and White, H.O. 1987. Saltwater intrusion in
aquifers: Development and testing of a three-dimensional finite element model. Water
Resources Research. 23: 2. 293-312.
13.Jamei, M., and Ghafouri, H. 2015. A discontinuous Galerkin method for two-phase flow
in porous media using modified MLP slope limiter. Modares Mechanical Engineering.
15: 12. 326-336.
14.Jamei, M., and Ghafouri, H. 2016. A novel discontinuous Galerkin model for two-phase flow
in porous media using an improved IMPES method. Inter. J. Num. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow.
26: 1. 284-306.
15.Johannsen, K. 2003. On the Validity of the Boussinesq Approximation for the Elder Problem.
Computational Geosciences. 7: 3. 169-182.
16.Kolditz, O., Ratke, R., Diersch, H.J.G., and Zielke, W. 1998. Coupled groundwater flow and
transport: 1. Verification of variable density flow and transport models. Advances in Water
Resources. 21: 1. 27-46.
17.Langevin, C.D., and Guo, W. 2006. MODFLOW/MT3DMS-based simulation of variabledensity ground water flow and transport. Ground water. 44: 3. 339-51.
18.Mazzia, A., and Putti, M. 2002. Mixed-finite element and finite volume discretization for
heavy brine simulations in groundwater. J. Com. Appl. Math. 147: 1. 191-213.
19.Oltean, C., and Buès, M.A. 2001. Coupled Groundwater Flow and Transport in Porous Media.
A Conservative or Non-conservative Form? Transport in Porous Media. 44: 2. 219-246.
20.Oude Essink, G. 1998. MOC3D adapted to simulate 3D density-dependent groundwater flow.
Proceedings of the MODFLOW’98 Conference, Pp: 291-303.
21.Pinder, G.F., and Cooper, H.H. 1970. A Numerical Technique for Calculating the Transient
Position of the Saltwater Front. Water Resources Research. 6: 3. 875-882.
22.Povich, T.J. 2012. Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods for variable density groundwater
flow and solute transport. J. Univ. Texas at Austin.
23.Putti, M., and Paniconi, C. 1995. Picard and Newton linearization for the coupled model for
saltwater intrusion in aquifers. Advances in Water Resources. 18: 3. 159-170.
24.Rivière, B. 2008. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic
equations: theory and implementation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
25.Segol, G., Pinder, G.F., and Gray, W.G. 1975. A Galerkin-finite element technique
for calculating the transient position of the saltwater front. Water Resources Research.
11: 2. 343-347.
26.Simmons, C.T., Fenstemaker, T.R., and Sharp, J.M. 2001. Variable-density groundwater
flow and solute transport in heterogeneous porous media: approaches, resolutions and future
challenges. J. Cont. Hydrol. 52: 1-4. 245-275.
27.Simpson, M.J., and Clement, T.P. 2004. Improving the worthiness of the Henry problem as a
benchmark for density-dependent groundwater flow models. Water Resources Research.
40: 1. 1-11.
28.Simpson, M.J., and Clement, T.P. 2003. Theoretical analysis of the worthiness of Henry and
Elder problems as benchmarks of density-dependent groundwater flow models. Advances in
Water Resources. 26: 1. 17-31.
29.Voss, C.I., Simmons, C.T., and Robinson, N.I. 2010. Three-dimensional benchmark for
variable-density flow and transport simulation: matching semi-analytic stability modes for
steady unstable convection in an inclined porous box. Hydrogeol. J. 18: 1. 5-23.
30.Voss, C.I., and Souza, W.R. 1987. Variable density flow and solute transport simulation of
regional aquifers containing a narrow freshwater-saltwater transition zone. Water Resources
Research. 23: 10. 1851-1866.
31.Woods, J.A., and Carey, G.F. 2007. Upwelling and downwelling behavior in the Elder-VossSouza benchmark. Water Resources Research. 43: 12. 1-12.
32.Younes, A., and Fahs, M. 2014. A semi-analytical solution for saltwater intrusion with a very
narrow transition zone. Hydrogeol. J. 22: 2. 501-506.
33.Zidane, A., Younes, A., Huggenberger, P., and Zechner, E. 2012. The Henry semianalytical
solution for saltwater intrusion with reduced dispersion. Water Resources Research. 48: 6. 1-10.