Study on the effect of initial soil moisture content on wind erosion rate using a laboratory wind tunnel

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

Abstract

Background and objectives: Wind erosion is known as one of land degradation aspects in arid and semiarid regions. Soil moisture affects the erosion rate through controlling threshold velocity and soil erodibility. This study was done to investigate the effect of initial soil moisture content on wind erosion rate and threshold velocity as well in two soils with different texture classes using a wind tunnel facility under controlled conditions.
Materials and Methods: The experiment was conducted in two separate tests on two soils with different texture classes, each as factorial based on completely randomized design. Two factors including wind speed and initial moisture each at three replications were applied for each soil. For this purpose, two soils with different texture classes of sandy loam and sandy were chosen, afterwards various levels of initial moisture were produced for each soil and then were exposed to several wind speeds. Regarding to the different texture and erosion threshold of the soils, three levels of initial moisture contents of 1.5, 6.5 and 11.5% for sandy loam and 1, 2.5 and 4.5% for sandy soil were produced. After preparing the soil samples and placing in the wind tunnel, wind velocities of 5, 7.5 and 10 m s–1 at 10 cm height were generated and finally, sediment yield due to wind erosion was measured. In addition, the threshold wind velocity was determined through the observation method. Furthermore, the critical moisture content for each soil was determined based on the minimum moisture amount in which a significant reduction in erosion rate was observed.
Results: Results of this study showed that with increasing wind speed and initial moisture content, wind erosion rates increased and decreased, respectively. The measured erosion rates for sandy loam and sandy soils ranged from 0.015 to 0.768 and 0.086 to 14.088 g m–2 min–1, this difference was attributed to the soils primary and secondary particle size distribution. With increasing the soils moisture content, the threshold wind velocity increased as a power function. The critical moisture contents of 6.5% and 4.5% were determined for sandy loam and sandy soils, respectively. With increasing moisture content in sandy loam soil from 1.5 to 6.5%, at wind velocities of 5, 7.5 and 10 m s–1, the erosion rate decreased by 64.6, 80.7 and 62.9%, while with increasing moisture content from 1.5 to 11.5%, it was reduced by 82.3, 90.8 and 77.5%, respectively. These reduction values for sandy soil for the increase in moisture from 1 to 1.5% were 27.7, 32.8 and 71.3% and for the increase in moisture content from 1 to 4.5% were 92.2, 86.6 and 93.9%, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings of this research revealed the importance of maintaining and or increasing in soil moisture to combat wind erosion, so that due to soil moisture increase, wind erosion rate can be restricted by 90%. It was concluded that the critical value of moisture content differs in various soils. This critical value for sandy soil (4.5%) was lower than that in sandy loam soil (6.5%). By reducing wind speed toward values less than the threshold velocity, in addition to soil management strategies to maintain and improve soil moisture, wind erosion can be reduced, remarkably.

Keywords


-1.Belly, P.Y. 1964. Sand Movement by Wind. Technical Memorandum 1. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Washington DC. 80p.
2.Bisal, F., and Hsieh, J. 1966. Influence of soil moisture on erodibility of soil by wind.
Soil Science. 102: 143-146.
3.Chepil, W.S., and Woodruff, N.P. 1963. The physics of wind erosion and its control.
Advances in Agronomy. 15: 211-302.
4.Colazo, J.C., and Buschiazzo, D.E. 2010. Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible
fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina. Geoderma. 159: 228-236.
5.Cornelis, W.M., Gabriels, D., and Hartmann, R. 2004. A parameterization for the threshold
shear velocity to initiate deflation of dry and wet sediment. Geomorphology. 59: 43-51.
6.Jain, R., Jain, P.K., and Bhadauria, S.S. 2010. Computational approach to predict soil shear
strength. Engineering Science and Technology. 2: 3874-3885.
7.Jilili, A., Liu, D.W., and Wu, G.Y. 2010. Saline dust storms and their ecological impacts in
arid regions. J. Arid Land. 2: 2. 144-150.
8.Lal, R., and Stewart, B.A. 1990. Soil degradation: a global threat. Advances in Soil Science.
11: 12-16.
9.Leuven, M.L. 1982. Influence of roughness elements and soil moisture on the resistance of
sand to wind erosion. P 161-173, In: D.H. Yaalon (Ed.), Aridic Soils and Geomorphic
Processes. Catena Supplement 1. Braunschweig Catena Verlag. 219p.
10.Leys, J.F., and Raupach, M.R. 1991. Soil flux measurements using a portable wind erosion
tunnel. Austr. J. Soil Res. 29: 4. 533-552.
11.Liu, L.Y., Li, X.Y., Shi, P.J., Gao, S.Y., Wang, J.H., Ta, W.Q., Song, Y., Liu, M.X., Wang,
Z., and Xia, B.L. 2007. Wind erodibility of major soils in the farming-pastoral ecotone of
China. J. Arid Environ. 68: 611-623.
12.Mahmoodabadi, M., and Ahmadbeygi, B. 2011. Effect of some physical and chemical
properties of soil on aggregate stability in some cultivation systems. J. Soil Manage. Sust.
Prod. 1: 2. 61-79. (In Persian)
13.Mahmoodabadi, M., and Ahmadbeygi, B. 2013. Dry and water-stable aggregates in different
cultivation systems of arid region soils. Arab. J. Geosci. 6: 2997-3002.
14.Mahmoodabadi, M., Dehghani, F., and Azimzadeh, H.R. 2011. Effect of soil particle size
distribution on wind erosion rate. J. Soil Manage. Sust. Prod. 1: 1. 81-98. (In Persian)
15.Mahmoodabadi, M., and Zamani, S. 2012. Effect of wind speed and soil particle size
distribution on sediment transport mechanisms due to wind erosion. J. Water. Engin.
Manage. 4: 3. 141-151. (In Persian)
16.Maleki, S., Karimi, A., and Hashemi, H. 2011. Wind erosion and its control in Gonabad. The
2nd International Conference on Wind Erosion and Dust. University of Yazd. (In Persian)
17.McKenna, N.C., and Nickling, W.G. 1989. A theoretical and wind tunnel investigation of the
effect of capillary water on the entrainment of sediment by wind. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69: 79-96.
18.Qing, H., Yang, X., Mamtimin, A., and Tang, Sh. 2011. Impact factors of soil wind erosion
in the center of desert. J. Arid Land. 3: 9-12.
19.Ravi, S., D’Odorico, P., Over, T.M., and Zobeck, T.M. 2004. On the effect of air humidity
on soil susceptibility to wind erosion: The case of air-dry soils. Geophysical Research Letter.
31: Lo9501, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019485.
20.Ravi, S., Zobeck, T.M., Over, T.M., Okin, G.S., and Odorico, P. 2006. On the effect of
moisture bonding forces in air-dry soils on threshold friction velocity of wind erosion.
Sedimentology. 53: 3. 597-609.
21.Rafahi, H.Gh. 2007. Water Erosion and its Control. The Fifth Edition. Tehran University
Press, 671p. (In Persian)
22.Sharratt, B.S., and Vaddella, V.K. 2012. Threshold friction velocity of soils within the
Columbia plateau. Aeolian Research. 6: 13-20.
23.Stout, J.E., and Zobeck, T.M. 1996. Establishing the threshold condition for soil movement
in wind eroding fields. Proceeding of the International Conference on Air Pollution from
Agricultural Operations, Midwest Plan Service. Kansas. Pp: 65-71.
24.Su, Y.Z., and Zhao, H.L. 2003. Losses of soil organic carbon and nitrogen and their
mechanisms in the desertification process of farmlands in Horqin sandy land. Agriculture
Sciences in China. 2: 8. 890-897.
25.Toy, T.J., Foster, G.R., and Renard, K.G. 2002. Soil Erosion, Processes, Predication,
Measurement, and Control. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 338p.
26.Visser, S.M., Sterk, G., and Ribolzi, O. 2004. Techniques for simultaneous quantification of
wind and water erosion in semi-arid regions. J. Arid Environ. 59: 699-717.
27.Wang, D., Fu, B., Zhao, W., Hu, H., and Wang, Y. 2008. Multifractal characteristics of soil
particle size distribution under different land-use types on the loess plateau, China. Catena.
72: 1. 29-36.
28.Wang, T. 2000. Land use and sandy desertification in north China. J. Des. Res. 20: 103-113.
29.Wiggs, G.F.S., Baird, A.J., and Atherton, R.J. 2004. The dynamic effects of moisture on the
entrainment and transport of sand by wind. Geomorphology. 59: 13-30.
30.Zamani, S., and Mahmoodabadi, M. 2013. Effect of particle-size distribution on wind
erosion rate and soil erodibility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 59: 12. 1743-1753.
31.Zhang, C.L., Zou, X.Y., Gong, G.R., Liu, L.Y., and Liu, Y.Z. 2004. Aerodynamic roughness
of cultivated soil and its influences on soil erosion by wind in a wind tunnel. Soil and Tillage
Research. 75: 53-59.
32.Zobeck, T.M., and Fryrear, D.W. 1986. Chemical and physical characteristics of windblown
sediment quantities and physical characteristics. Transactions of the ASAE. 29: 1032-1035.