Effect of zeolite on distribution of different soil potassium pools in Vertisols of Fars province

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Author

Abstract

Background and objectives: Due to the large surface area and high cation exchange capacity zeolite as an amendment of physicochemical soil characteristics can be secondary effects on the ability to use nutrients such as potassium and changing different forms of the element and thus the cycle. However, the addition of this compound to Vertisols mainly with high amounts in clay mineral with high capacity for k fixation such as smectite can affect the distribution of potassium. To investigate this, the effects of adding different amounts of the zeolite and wetting and drying treatment were studied on 6 Vertisols that were collected from different regions of Fars province.
Materials and methods: Based on previous soil maps, aerial photos and topographic maps of Fars province`s Vertisols were selected and some soil profiles were dug in different climatic conditions. After description, six pedons were chosen as representative that almost all Vertisols studied in xeric moisture regimes in the northern and central parts of the province and all of them are in great groups Haploxererts and Calcixererts. Soils were located in the piedmont plain, plateau and lowland physiography. Experiment‌‌ was‌ a completely randomized 3×2×4×6 factorial arrangement on surface horizons after treat‌ment of soils with zeolite (0, 1, 2.5 and 5%) and wetting and drying treatment. After 8 days, different forms of potassium consisting of soluble, exchangeable and non-exchangeable forms) were determined in the samples. Statistical analysis was done by using the software SPSS, Excel, SAS and comparison of means was carried out using the Duncan’s test.
Results: The studied soils comprise ustic and xeric moisture regimes and mesic, thermic and hyperthemic temperature regimes. Although the mineralogical composition of the various soils were more or less the same, due to the different amounts of various clay minerals in different soils the amounts of different kinds of K was very different in soils. The results showed that zeolite application can increase the amounts of soluble and exchangeable potassium while it has no effect on non exchangeable potassium, which could be due to the high amount of potassium in zeolite and great tendency of zeolite to absorb potassium. Zeolite application with and without wetting and drying treatment has increased the amounts of soluble potassium in different soils. Maximum increase was observed in soil which has the lower amounts of smectites. Wetting and drying treatment caused significant reduction of soluble potassium in all samples. Exchangeable K has significantly increased by the addition of zeolite. Highest concentrations of exchangeable potassium were observed in soils with less amounts of smectite. Zeolite application has reduced non-exchangeable potassium in soils but had different effect on soil no. 4 and has increased the non-exchangeable potassium. This indicates potassium fixation in the soils which could be due to the high amounts of minerals capable to fix potassium. Wetting and drying treatment caused the reduction of soluble and non-exchangeable K and increase of exchangeable K.
Conclusion: The increase of soluble K as a result of zeolite application can enhance possibility of potassium leaching but on the other hand it is also able to prevent the leaching and fixation of K by retention of potassium in exchangeable sites. Considering the very low amount of available potassium in highly calcareous soils of Fars, which is the results of intensive agriculture and little or no K fertilization, zeolite application, may be able to improve the status of potassium in these soils.

Keywords


1.Asadi, Y. 2008. The effect of natural zeolite. Proceedings of the First International Conference of Iranian zeolite. (In Persian)
2.Chapman, H.D. 1965. Cation exchange capacity. P 891-901, In: C.A. Black (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Madison (WI): America Society of Agronomy.
3.Dhaliwal, A.K., Gupta, R.K., Singh, Y., and Singh, B. 2006. Potassium fixation and release characteristics of some benchmark soil series under rice–wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of northwestern India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 37: 827-845.
4.Filcheva, E.G., and Tsadilas, C.D. 2002. Influence of clinoptilolite and compost on soil properties. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 33: 3-4. 595-607.
5.Ghorbani, H., and Babaei, A. 2008. The effect of natural zeolite on ions adsorption and reducing solution electrical conductivity Na and K solutions. International meeting on soil fertility land management and agroclimatologu. Turkey, Pp: 974-955.
6.Havlin, J.L., Beaton, J.D., Tisdale, S.L., and Nelson, W.L. 1999. Soil fertility and fertilizers. Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London.
7.Heidari, A., Mahmoodi, S., Roozitalab, M.H., and Mermut, A.R. 2008. Diversity of Clay Minerals in the Vertisols of Three Different Climatic Regions in Western Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 10: 269-284.
8.Helmeke, P.A., and Sparks, D.L. 1996. Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods. America Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
9.Jackson, M.L. 1975. Soil Chemical Analysis: Advanced Course. Department of Soils, College of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
10.Jafari, S., and Baghernejad, M. 2007. Effects of wetting and drying, and cultivation systems on potassium fixation in some Khouzestan soils. J. Sci. Technol. Agric. Natur. Resour.
11: 41. 90-98.
11.Kittrick, J.A., and Hope, E.W. 1963. A procedure for the particle size separation of soils for X-ray diffraction analysis. Soil Science. 96: 312-325.
12.Miller, D.L., Mora, C.I., and Driese, S.G. 2007. Isotopic variability in large
carbonate nodules in Vertisols implications for climate and ecosystem assessments. Geoderma. 142: 104-111.
13.Nabiollahy, K., Khormali, F., Bazargan, K., and Ayoubi, Sh. 2006. Forms of K as a function of clay mineralogy and soil development. Clay Miner. 41: 739-749.
14.Najafi-Ghiri, M. 2010. Morphological and mineralogical characteristics of the soils of FarsProvince. PhD thesis, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz. (In Persian)
15.Najafi-Ghiri, M., Abtahi, A., Jaberian, F., and Owliaie, H.R. 2010. Relationship between soil potassium forms and mineralogy in highly calcareous soils of southern Iran. Austr. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 4: 3. 434-441.
16.Najafi-Ghiri, M., Abtahi, A., Owliaie, H.R., Hashemi, S.S., and Koohkan, H. 2011. Factors affecting potassium pools distribution in highly calcareous soils of southern Iran. Arid Land Research and Management. 25: 313-327.
17.Najafi-Ghiri, M., and Owliaie, H.R. 2014. Effects of zeolite and vermicompost applications on Different forms of potassium in calcareous soils of FarsProvince. J. Soil Water Sci.
In press. (In Persian)
18.Nelson, D.W., and Sommers, L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter.
P 961-1010, In: Sparks, D.L., Fendorf, S.E., Toner, Ch V., and Carski, T.H. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part III, 3rd Ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI. 
19.Nourbakhsh, G., Dordipour, A., and Khormali, F. 2011. Zeolite effect on the absorption and utilization efficiency of potassium fertilizers. Twelfth Congress of Soil Science. Tabriz, Iran. 80p. (In Persian)
20.Olk, D.C., Cassman, K.G., and Carlson, R.M. 1995. Kinetics of potassium fixation in vermiculitic soils under different moisture regimes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59: 423-429.
21.Panuccio, M.R., Crea, F., Sorgona, A., and Caccoa, G. 2007. Adsorption of nutrients and cadmium by different minerals: Experimental studies and modeling. J. Environ. Manage.
88: 890-898.
22.Pisanu, A., Manca, B., Mule, P., Chessa, F., and Meloni, S. 2007. Amended soils
with natural zeolites: analysis of two-year tests on greenhouse tomato. Acta Horticulture. 747: 211-218.
23.Rezaei, M., and Movahedi Naeini, S.A.R. 2009. Kinetics of potassium desorption from the loess soil, soil mixed with zeolite and the clinoptilolite zeolite as influenced by calcium and ammonium. J. Appl. Sci. 9: 18. 3335-3342.
24.Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. U. S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. USDA. Hand book No. 60. Washington, DC, USA. 160p.
25.Rodriguez, F., Guerrero, C., Moral, R., Ayguade, H., and Mataix-Beneyto, J. 2005. Effects of composted and non-composted solid phase of pig slurry on N, P, and K contents in two Mediterranean soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 36: 635-647.
26.Rowell, D.L. 1994. Soil Science: Methods and applications. Longman Scientific and Technical, UK.
27.Smaranda, M., Benoni, L., and Corneliu, B. 2006. Zinc Extraction From Polluted Soils By Using Zeolite And Vicia sativa Plant. National R&D Institiute For Industrial Ecology, ECOIND, Timsora.
28.Smith, S.J., Clark, L.J., and Scott, A.D. 1968. Exchangeability of potassium in soils: Ninth Intern. Congr. Soil Science. 2: 661-669.
29.Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Soil survey manual. USDA. Hand book No. 18. Washington, DC.
30.Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, (12th), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
31.Srinivasa Rao, C., Singh, R.N., Ganeshamurthy, A.N., Singh, G., and Masood, A. 2007. Fixation and recovery of added phosphorus and potassium in different soil types of
pulse-growing regions of India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38: 449-460.
32.Tarkalson, D.D., and Ippolito, J.A. 2011. Clinoptilolite zeolite influence on nitrogen in a manure-amended sandy agricultural soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 42: 2370-2378.