Derivation the Suitable Pedotranfer Functions for Prediction of Some Difficulty Available Soil Properties

Document Type : Complete scientific research article

Authors

1 University of Tabriz

2 University of Tehran

Abstract

Background and Objective: Direct measurement of some soil properties may be difficult, costly and time consuming. So, these properties can be predicted usefully using easily available data. Soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) is a vital indicator of soil fertility and pollutant sequestration capacity. Soil hydrodynamic properties drive the flow of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system, and hence control processes such as aquifer recharge or nutrient fluxes between soil and vegetation. Knowledge of soil hydrodynamics is important for modeling physical processes related to soil water content. Despite great advances in measurement methods, it is still difficult to determine soil hydraulic properties accurately, especially for undisturbed soils and in the dry range. However, the measurement of the soil hydraulic properties and CEC is time-consuming, labor-intensive and expensive. That is why, the present study aimed to develop pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for the estimation of field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and CEC of the soils of Guilan province.
Materials and Methods: Study area is located in south of Guilan Province, Gilevan region, northern Iran. The climate is aridic. The annual precipitation is 245 mm, and the average temperature is 18 °C. A total of 240 soil samples from 0-30 cm layer of this region were collected. Then, both difficulty and easily available properties such as clay, sand and silt percent, CaCO3, organic matter, bulk density and gypsum were measured. The first step for using statistical methods is to study the normality of data. In order to know whether the data were normal, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used. Data were divided into two groups of test (%25) and train (%75). This division carried out in such a way that statistical characteristics of two groups such as minimum, maximum, standard deviation, etc. were similar. Then regression and artifitial neural network (ANN) models set on training data. For prevention of error in ANN process, data converted in standard scale from 0.1 to 0.9. Multi-layer percepteron, feed forward backpropagation, and Levenberg-Marquardt functions were used for extension of ANN. Relative root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R2) and model efficiency factor (MEF) criteria were used for evaluation of models.
Results: In regression analysis, for CEC, clay and organic matter percent, in FC moisture content, clay, silt as well as bulk density, and for PWP, clay percent showed significant effects in created models. Coefficients of determination in created linear models for CEC, FC and PWP were 0.72, 0.84 and 0.73, respectively.While these coefficients for non-linear models were 0.78, 0.87 and 0.74 for CEC, FC and PWP, respectively. The best PTFs for prediction of difficulty available properties in ANN obtained by multi-layer perceptron model with 2 hidden layers, 8 neurons for FC and PWP, 6 neurons for CEC and considering all inputs. Coefficients of determination for CEC, FC and PWP were 0.98, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. ANNs designed for prediction of difficulty available properties with inputs include soil easily available properties that have the most sensitivity coefficient with difficulty available property. Test results of these models were similarity non-linear regression models. The results of models compared with test data showed that the models obtained from ANNs were more accurate than the regression model.
Conclusion: In regression method, non-linear models for prediction of soil difficulty available properties were more accurate than linear models. In ANNs, models with inputs including all of the soil easily available properties were more accurate than models with inputs include soil easily available properties that have the most sensitivity coefficient with difficulty available property.

Keywords


1.Agyare, W.A., Park, S.J., and Vlek, P.L.G. 2007. Artificial neural network estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Vadose Zone J. 6: 423-431.
2.Amini, M., Abbaspour, K.C., Khademi, H., Fathianpour, N., Afyuni, M., and Schulin, R. 2005. Neural network models to predict cation exchange capacity in arid regions of Iran. Europ. J. Soil Sci. 56: 551-559.
3.Bayat, H., Davatgar, N., and Jalali, M. 2014. Prediction of CEC using fractal parameters by artificial neural networks. International Agrophysics. 28: 143-152.
4.Burt, R. 2014. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigations report No. 42, Version 5. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center.
5.Esmaeelnejad, L. 2008. Investigation on physicochemical and mineralogical properties of the marls and their effect on soil erosion in the south of Guilan province. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, 165p.
6.Esmaeelnejad, L., Ramezanpour, H., Seyedmohammadi, J., and Shabanpour, M. 2015. Selection of a suitable model for the prediction of soil water content in north of Iran. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 13: 1. 12-2.
7.Ghorbani Dashtaki, S., Homaee, M., and Khodaverdiloo, H. 2011. Derivation and validation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve using a variety of soil data. Soil Use and Management. 26: 68-74.
8.Haverkamp, R., Leij, F.J., Fuentes, C., Sciortino, A., and Ross, P.J. 2005. Soil water retention. I. Introduction of shape index. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 69: 1881-1890.
9.Horn, R., Fleige, H., Richter, F.H., Czyz, E.A., Dexter, A., Diaz-Pereira Damitru, E., Enarche, R., Mayol, F., Rajkai, K., Delarosa, D., and Simota, C. 2005. SIDASS project 5: prediction of mechanical strength of arable soils and its effects on physical properties at various map scales. Soil and Tillage Research. 82: 47-56.
10.Khodaverdiloo, H., Homaee, M., van Genuchten, M.T., and Ghorbani Dashtaki, S. 2011. Deriving and validating pedotransfer functions for some calcareous soils. J. Hydrol. 399: 93-99.
11.Kianpoor, K.Y., Rezaie, A.R., Amerikhah, H., and Sami, M. 2012. Comparison of multiple linear regressions and artificial intelligence-based modeling techniques for prediction the soil cation exchange capacity of Aridisols and Entisols in a semiarid region. Austr. J. Agric. Engin. 3: 39-46.
12.McBratney, A.B., Minasny, B., Cattle, S.R., and Vervoort, R.W. 2002. From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems. Geoderma. 109: 41-73.
13.Merdun, H., Cinar, O., Meral, R., and Apan, M. 2006. Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil and Tillage Research. 90: 108-116.
14.Mosaddeghi, M.R., and Mahboubi, A.A. 2011. Point pedotransfer functions for prediction of water retention of selected soil series in a semi-arid region of western Iran. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 57: 327-342.
15.Rawls, W.J., and Pachepsky, Y.A. 2002. Soil consistence and structure as predictors of water retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 66: 1115-1126.
 16.Sarmadian, F., Azimi, S., Keshavarzi, A., and Ahmadi, A. 2013. Neural computing model for prediction of soil cation exchange capacity: A data mining approach. Inter. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 4: 7. 1706-1712. 
17.Sarmadian, F., Taghizadeh Mehrjardi, R., and Akbarzadeh, A. 2009. Modeling of some soil properties using artificial neural network and multivariate regression in Gorgan province, north of Iran. Austur. J. Bas. Appl. Sci. 3: 1. 323-329.
18.Seybold, C.A., Grossman, R.B., and Reinch, T.G. 2005. Predicting cation exchange capacity for soil survey using linear models. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 69: 856-886.