نگرش و کاربست عملیات حفاظت آب و خاک توسط کشاورزان حوزه آبخیز تلخه رود شهرستان هریس، استان آذربایجان شرقی

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مهندسی آب و مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد مدیریت کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی آب و مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

3 دانشیار گروه مهندسی آب و مدیریت کشاورزی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

چکیده

سابقه و هدف. فرسایش خاک از مهم‌ترین چالش‌های جهانی برای کشاورزی و تولید مواد غذایی به شمار می‌رود. یکی از علل مهم فرسایش، مداخله بی‌رویه انسان در طبیعت است. موفقیت هرگونه برنامه‌ حفاظتی مستلزم درک جنبه‌‌های مختلف رفتاری انسان است. رفتارها عمدتاٌ از دانش و نگرش افراد نشات می‌گیرند. نگرش کشاورزان می‌تواند رفتار آنها را برای پذیرش شیوه‌های حفاظتی تحت تاثیر قرار دهد. مطالعه نگرش و رفتار کشاورزان نسبت به شیوه‌های حفاظتی می‌تواند نقش بسزایی در کمک به مدیران و تصمیم‌گیران در شناخت چرایی رفتار حفاظتی کشاورزان و اصلاح و بهبود آن داشته باشد. در زمینه پذیرش و کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظت از آب و خاک مطالعات زیادی در جهان انجام شده است. اما بسیاری از مطالعات بر جنبه‌های صرفاٌ اقتصادی اجتماعی مؤثر بر پذیرش متمرکز شده‌اند. این تحقیق با نگاهی جامع‌، ضمن بررسی نگرش کشاورزان نسبت به شیوه‌های حفاظتی، دسترسی به منابع و امکانات برای کاربست و موانع کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظتی، به بررسی میزان کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظتی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن از جنبه‌های ادراکی- نگرشی و اقتصادی اجتماعی پرداخته و رفتار حفاظتی کشاورزان حوزه آبخیز رودخانه تلخه‌رود شهرستان هریس، استان آذربایجان شرقی را از جنبه‌های مختلف مورد بررسی قرار داده است.
مواد و روش‌ها. این تحقیق به روش پیمایشی انجام شد. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل کلیه کشاورزان حوزه آبخیز رودخانه تلخه‌رود شهرستان هریس بود. با استفاده از فرمول نمونه‌گیری کوکران، 220 کشاورز انتخاب و داده‌های لازم از طریق مصاحبه رو در رو با کشاورزان گردآوری گردید. نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی چند مرحله‌ای انجام شد. ابزار تحقیق پرسشنامه‌ای بود که اکثر بخش‌های آن در طیف پنج گزینه‌ای لیکرت بود. روایی ابزار تحقیق توسط گروهی از اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه و کارشناسان میدانی کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مورد تایید قرار گرفت و برای به دست آوردن پایایی ابزار تحقیق، یک مطالعه راهنما با همکاری 30 کشاورز در منطقه خارج از روستاهای نمونه مورد بررسی انجام شد و اصلاحات لازم در پرسشنامه صورت گرفت. مقادیر کرونباخ آلفای مقیاس‌های پرسشنامه نشان داد که ابزار تحقیق از پایایی کافی برخوردار می‌باشد.
یافته‌ها. نتایج نشان داد که کشاورزان مورد مطالعه نگرش مثبتی نسبت به شیوه‌های حفاظتی داشتند. از میان 12 شیوه‌ حفاظتی منتخب، کاربست کمپوست، لایروبی کانال‌های آبیاری، وجین و بقایای گیاهی در سطح در سطح بالای متوسط قرار داشت. کاربست بقیه شیوه‌ها در حد پایین‌تر از متوسط قرار داشت. ایجاد بادشکن و سیل‌بند نیز در حد خیلی ضعیفی قرار داشت. از دیدگاه پاسخگویان، خردی و پراکندگی اراضی و فقدان استطاعت مالی از مهم‌ترین موانع کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظتی بودند. نتایج همچنین نشان داد که بین کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظتی همبستگی معنی‌داری وجود داشت. براساس نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون، نگرش و دسترسی به امکانات مهم‌ترین عوامل ادراکی- نگرشی و تحصیلات و سابقه فعالیت‌های کشاورزی مهم‌ترین عوامل اقتصادی-اجتماعی تبیین کننده کاربست شیوه‌های حفاظتی بودند.
نتیجه‌گیری. نتایج نشان داد که کشاورزان نگرش نسبتاً مثبتی نسبت به شیوه‌های حفاظت آب و خاک داشتند ولی در عمل شیوه‌های کم هزینه، با استفاده از امکانات موجود و زودبازده را به کار می‌گرفتند. به دلیل ضعف استطاعت مالی، کاربست شیوه‌هایی که نیاز به سرمایه-گذاری داشت در بین آنها چندان متداول نبود. رفع موانع و محدودیت‌ها، فراهم آوردن تسهیلات و امکانات لازم و ارایه برنامه‌های آموزشی و ترویجی می‌تواند در زمینه توسعه کاربست این شیوه‌ها مؤثر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Farmers’ attitudes towards and application of soil and water conservation practices in Talkhehrood basin of Harris County, East Azarbaijan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Asghar Bagheri 1
  • Mojtaba Sookhtanlou 2
  • Ali Teymori 3
1 Professor, Dept. of Water Engineering and Agricultural Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 M.Sc. Graduate of Agricultural Management, Dept. of Water Engineering and Agricultural Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
3 Associate Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering and Agricultural Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Soil erosion is of the important global challenges for agricultural and food production. The indiscriminate intervention of man in the nature is of the main reasons for erosion. The success of any conservation program requires an understanding of the various aspects of human behavior. Behaviors are mainly emerge from the people’s knowledge and attitudes. Farmers' attitudes can influence their behavior to adopt conservation practices. Studying the attitude and behavior of farmers towards conservation practices can play a crucial role to help managers and decision makers in understanding the reason for farmers' conservation behavior and to modify and improve it. Several studies have been conducted worldwide on the adoption and application of soil and water conservation methods. Many of them have focused on the purely socioeconomic aspects of the adoption. While the current study examined the attitude of farmers towards conservation practices, access to facilities for and barriers to the application of these practices. The study also examined the perceptual-attitudinal and socioeconomic aspects affecting the implementation of conservation practices. Therefore, the conservation behavior of farmers in Talkhehrood basin in Harris County, East Azarbaijan province has been studied from different aspects.
Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude towards conservation practices and the application of these practices. Survey research method was used in this study. A sample of 220 farmers was selected using Cochran's sampling formula and the necessary data were collected using a face to face interviewing procedure. The random multistage sampling method was used to select the sample farmers. The instrument of the study was a questionnaire. Most sections of the questionnaire was in the form of 5-points Likert items. It was validated by a panel of university staffs and field experts of agricultural and natural resources. A pilot study was conducted using 30 farmers from out of the sample villages for reliability and correction of the questionnaire. The calculated values of Cronbach’s alpha showed that the questionnaire has sufficient reliability.
Results: The results showed that farmers had a positive attitude towards conservation practices. Among the 12 selected conservation practices, compost application, dredging of irrigation canals, weeding and retaining crop residues were at the above-average level. The use of other methods was below the average. Creating windbreaks and flood dam was very weak. Respondents perceived that land fragmentation and lack of financial ability were the most important obstacles to the application of conservation practices. Significant correlations were found between the implementation of most conservation practices. Based on the regression analyses, attitude and access to facilities were the most important perceptual-attitudinal factors, as well as education and farming experiences were the most important socio-economic factors explaining the implementation of conservation methods.
Conclusion: The results showed that while farmers had a relatively positive attitude towards soil and water conservation practices, they implemented low-cost and quick-return practices using available facilities. Due to the lack of financial abilities, the use of practices that required financial investment was not very common among them. Removing barriers and restrictions, providing the necessary facilities and providing educational and extension programs can be effective in promoting the implementation of these practices.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Water and soil conservation
  • erosion
  • attitude
  • implementation
  • Talkhehrood basin
1.Agassi, M. 2012. The Advantages of implementation of water conservation practices in arid semiarid regions. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 18: 2-3. 63-69.
2.Asaful-Ajdaye, J. 2008. Factors affecting the adoption of soil conservation measures: a case study of Fijian cane farmers. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 33: 99-117.
3.Ashoori, D., Bagheri, A., Allahyari, M.S., and Michailidis, A. 2016a. Understanding the attitudes and practices of paddy farmers for enhancing soil andwater conservation in Northern Iran. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 4: 260-266.
4.Ashoori, D., Bagheri, A., Allahyari,M.S., and Al-Ri mawi, A.S. 2016b.An examination of soil and water conservation practices in the paddy fields of Guilan province, Iran. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences. Pp: 1-13.
5.Bakhsh, K., Hassan, I., Khurshid, W., and Hassan, S. 2012. Econometric Analysisof Adoption of Water Conservation Practices: A Case of Cotton Crop. Journal of Agricultural Research. 50: 3.
6.Bazrafkan, Kh., Zamani, Gh., Rezaeimoghaddam, K., and Namdar, R. 2020. Behavioral Model of Crop Soil Conservation (Case Study: Wheat farmers in Marvdasht Township). J. of Waterand Soil Conservation, 27: 4. 109-128.(In Persian)
7.Bayramin, I.O., Baskan, D., and Parlak, M. 2003. Soil erosion assessment with CONA model: Case study Beypazri area. Turk Journal of Agriculture. 27: 105-116.
8.Bielders, C., Ramelot, C., and Persoons, E. 2003. Farmer perception of runoff and erosion and extent of flooding in the
silt-loam belt of the Belgian Walloon Region. Environmental Sciences and Policy. 6: 85-93.
9.Brown, S., Chaney, R.L., and Hettiarachchi, G.M. 2016. Lead in urban soils: A real or perceived concern for urban agriculture. J. Environ. Qual.45: 26-36.
10.Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques. New York, NY: Willey, 448p.
11.De Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnar, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., and Tenge, A. 2008. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography. 28: 271-280.
12.Earle, T., Rose, C., and Brownlea, A 1979. Socioeconomic predictors of intention towards soil conservation and their implications in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management. 9: 225-236.
13.Ellis, F. 1993. Peasant economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.Gedefaw, M., Denghua, Y., Hao, W., Alemu, B., Chanie, and M., Agitew, G. 2018. Evaluation of adoption behavior of soil and water conservation practices in the Simein Mountain National Park, Highlands of Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 4: 1513782.
15.Greene, W.H. 2002. Econometric analysis Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, US: Pearson Education, Inc, 959p.
16.Hasanzadeh, M. 2001. The role of effective information on land management, soil erosion and sustainable development. Proceedings of national conference on land management, soil erosion and sustainable development. Arak. January 27: 85-93. (In Persian)
17.Issaka, S., and Ashraf, M.A. 2017. Impact of soil erosion and degradation on water quality: a review. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes. 1: 1. 1-11.
18.Jara-Rojas, R., Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Engler, A., and Díaz, J. 2013. An analysis of the joint adoption ofwater conservation and soil conservation in Central Chile. Land Use Policy.32: 292-301.
19.Li, X.G., and Wei, X. 2011. Soil erosion analysis of human influence on the controlled basin system of Check dams in small watersheds of the Loess Plateau, China. Expert Systems with Applications. 38: 4. 4233-4228.
20.Long, L. 2003. Conservation Practices Adoption by Agricultural Land Owners. Doctoral Dissertation. Northern Illinois University. Delealb, Illinois.
21.Noorollah-noorivandi, A., Ajili, A., Chizari, M., and Bijani, M. 2012. Comparison of soil conservation adoption model in Khuzestan Province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal. 7: 2. 21-33 (In Persian)
22.Novak, P., and Korsching. P. 1979. Preventive innovations: Problems in the adoption of agricultural conservation practices. In Sociological Factors in the Adoption of Best Management Practices: Annual Report to theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
23.O’brien, R.M. 2007. Caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual.Quant. 41: 673-690.
24.Pannell, D.J. 1999. Uncertainty and adoption of sustainable farming systems conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 51: 313-321.
25.Posthumus, H., Gardebroek, C., and Ruben, R. 2010. From participation to adoption: comparing the effectiveness of soil conservation programs in the Peruvian Andes. Land Economics.86: 4. 645-667.
26.Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Sabour, L.,and Menati-Zadeh, M. 2017. Factors Influencing Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices among Farmers in Garmsar County. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal.13: 1. 59-73. (In Persian)
27.Rezvanfar, A., Samiee, A., and Faham, E. 2009. Analysis of factors affecting adoption of sustainable soil conservation practices among wheat growers. World Applied Sciences Journal. 6: 5. 644-651.
28.Rogge, E., Evens, F., and Gulinck, H. 2007. Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning.82: 159-174.
29.Sain, G.E., and Barreto, H.J. 1996. The adoption of soil conservation technology in El Salvador: linking productivity and conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 51: 313-321.
30.Seifi, R., Chizari, M., and Abbas, E. 2018. Factors Affecting Framers’ Soil Conservation Behavior in West Azerbaijan Province: A Cultural Approach. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal.13: 2. 219-234. (In Persian)
31.Shafiee, F., Rezvanfar, A., Hossini, S.M., and Sarmadian, F. 2008. Opinion survey on soil conservation practices (The case study of Karkheh and Dez watershed’s farmer’s attitude, Khuzestan, Iran). Iran-Watershed Management Science and Engineering. 2: 3-10.(In Persian)
32.Shiri, N., Kazem Hashemi, S.M., Mirakzadeh, A.A., and Esshaghi, SR. 2013. Factors Affecting Using Soil Conservation Practices (SCDs) by Farmers in Ilam Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 44: 2. 297-308 (In Persian)
33.Sileshi, M., Kadigi, R., Mutabazi, K., and Sieber, S. 2019. Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. InternationalSoil and Water Conservation Research. 7: 4. 354-361.
34.Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., and Köhlin, G. 2014. Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage
and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: Impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor. Ecological Economics. 93: 4. 85-93.
35.Wolka, K., Mulder, J., and Biazin, B. 2018. Effects of soil and water conservation techniques on crop yield, runoff and soil loss in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Agricultural Water Management. 207: 67-79.
36.Zandi, J. 2017. Evaluation of the useof biologic mulches in water andsoil conservation. Doctoral Dissertation, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Sari.(In Persian)
37.Zeweld, W., Huylenbroeck, G.V., Tesfay, G., Azadi, H., and Speelman, S. 2018. Impacts of Socio-Psychological Factors on Actual Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices in Dryland and Water Stressed Areas. Sustainability. 10: 2963.