تأثیر ورمی‌کولیت، بنتونیت و زئولیت بر میزان تبخیر و منحنی رطوبتی خاک

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، رشته آبیاری و زهکشی، دانشگاه شهرکرد

2 گروه مهندسی آب دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهرکرد

3 دانشیار گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه شهرکرد

4 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک دانشگاه شهرکرد

چکیده

سابقه و هدف: کمبود آب به‌ویژه در مناطق خشک مهم‌ترین مشکل توسعه کشاورزی است. بنابراین بررسی راهکارهای افزایش بهره-وری آب باید مورد توجه قرار گیرد. ارائه‌ی راه‌هایی برای کنترل و کاهش تبخیر از خاک می‌تواند راهکاری مناسب برای افزایش کارایی مصرف آب باشد. تبخیر از سطح خاک را می‌توان عمده‌ترین بخش از اجزای بیلان آب در مناطق خشک دانست که باعث هدر رفت آب می‌شود، یکی از راه‌های کنترل و کاهش تبخیر از خاک، استفاده از مواد اصلاح‌کننده طبیعی خاک می‌باشد. از این‌رو این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر سه اصلاح‌کننده بنتونیت، ورمی‌کولیت و زئولیت بر میزان و شدت تبخیر از سطح خاک در یک دوره‌ی 4 ماهه از تیر تا مهر انجام شد.
مواد و روش‌ها: این پژوهش به‌صورت طرح کاملا تصادفی با 10 تیمار و در سه تکرار در دانشگاه شهرکرد انجام گرفت. تیمارهای مورد بررسی در این پژوهش، شامل 3 نوع اصلاح کننده طبیعی خاک (بنتونیت، ورمی‌کولیت و زئولیت) و هر کدام در سه نسبت وزنی 5/0، 1 و 2 درصد به همراه یک تیمار شاهد (خاک بدون ماده اصلاح کننده با بافت لوم) می‌باشند. انتخاب این درصدها بر این مبنا بود که نتایج به دلایل اقتصادی و عملی بودن اجرا، قابل توصیه برای سطوح و اراضی وسیع کشاورزی نیز باشند. در مرحله بعد با اندازه-گیری مقدار آب ورودی و مقدار زه‌آب خروجی هر گلدان و با استفاده از رابطه بیلان آب مقدار تبخیر اندازه‌گیری شد. میزان رطوبت نیز با دستگاه رطوبت‌سنج و در دو عمق‌ 5 و 15 سانتی‌متری اندازه‌گیری شد. در نهایت منحنی رطوبتی خاک برای هر تیمار و با استفاده از دستگاه صفحات فشاری، ترسیم و مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد در بین سه ماده مورد بررسی بیشترین میزان کاهش در تبخیر از خاک مربوط به بنتونیت می‌باشد. دو اصلاح‌کننده ورمی‌کولیت و زئولیت نیز تبخیر را بصورت معنی‌داری نسبت به تیمار شاهد کاهش دادند ولی نسبت به هم تفاوت معنی-داری نشان ندادند. در بین تیمارهای مورد بررسی نیز بیشترین تاثیر کاهشی بر مقدار تبخیر در تیمار 2 درصد بنتونیت مخلوط با خاک و کمترین میزان تاثیر نیز در تیمار زئولیت 5/0 درصد مشاهد شد این تیمار تفاوت معنی‌داری با شاهد نشان نداد ولی تیمار 2 درصد بنتونیت، 4/6 درصد میزان تبخیر را نسبت به شاهد کاهش داد. نتایج میزان رطوبت خاک در تیمارها برعکس نتایج تبخیر بود، در تیمارهایی که میزان تبخیر کمتر می‌باشد، میزان رطوبت خاک افزایش یافته است. با توجه به تاثیر معنی‌دار سه اصلاح‌کننده مورد بررسی بر میزان رطوبت خاک، منحنی رطوبتی خاک نیز در تیمارهای مورد بررسی نسبت به شاهد دچار تغییر شده است. بیشترین مقدار افزایش رطوبت در مکش معادل FC، در تیمار 2 درصد بنتونیت و معادل 8/4 درصد بیشتر از مقدار رطوبت تیمار شاهد بدست آمد.
نتیجه گیری: استفاده از مواد اصلاحی طبیعی خاک ضمن جلوگیری از آلوده شدن خاک، به اصلاح ساختمان خاک در جهت کاهش تبخیر نیز کمک می‌کند. با توجه به اینکه از بین سه ماده اصلاحی مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، بیشترین مقدار تاثیر بر کاهش تبخیر و افزایش رطوبت خاک، مربوط به بنتونیت 2 درصد بود، بنابراین می‌توان این ماده را برای کاهش تبخیر از خاک با بافت لوم توصیه نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Vermiculite, Bentonite and Zeolite on Evaporation and Soil Characteristic Moisture Curve

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Amani 1
  • Ahmad Reza Ghasemi 2
  • Mohammad Reza Nouri 3
  • Hamid Reza Motaghian 4
1 M.S. Student of Irrigation Drainage, Shahrekord University
2 Water engineering Department, shahrekord University
3 Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Shahrekord University
4 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, University Shahrekord
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Water scarcity is the most important problem in agricultural development, especially in arid areas. Therefore, the study of strategies to increase water use efficiency must be considered. Providing methods to control and reduce soil evaporation can be a suitable way to increase water use efficiency. Soil surface Evaporation can be considered as the main part of water balance components in arid areas that cause water wastage. One of the ways to control and reduce evaporation from the soil is to use natural amendments. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of three minerals including bentonite, vermiculite and zeolite on the amount and intensity of evaporation from the soil surface in a period of 4 months from Tir (July) to Mehr (October).
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a completely randomized design (CRD) with 10 treatments and three replications at Shahrekord University. The studied treatments in this research include 3 types of natural amendments (bentonite, vermiculite and zeolite) at three levels of 0.5, 1 and 2% with a control treatment (soil without any amendment). These natural minerals were mixed in soil of whole pots. The amount of evaporation was measured by measuring the amount of irrigation water of each pot and outlet water of them and based on the water balance equation. Moisture content was measured with a hygrometer at two depths of 5 and 15 cm. Finally, the soil moisture characteristic curve for each treatment by using of pressure plate was obtained and compared.
Results: The results showed that among the three studied minerals, the highest reduction in soil evaporation was related to bentonite. The two minerals vermiculite and zeolite also significantly reduced evaporation compared to the control treatment, but the difference between them was not significant. Among the studied treatments, the highest reduction effect on evaporation was observed in 2% bentonite mixed with soil and the lowest effect was observed in 0.5% zeolite treatment. This treatment did not show a significant difference with the control, but 2% bentonite treatment significantly reduced the rate of evaporation compared to the control by 6.4%. The results the soil moisture in the treatments was the opposite of the evaporation results. In the treatments where the evaporation rate was lower, the moisture content increased. Due to the significant effect of the three minerals on the soil moisture, the soil moisture curve in the studied treatments has also changed compared to the control.
Conclusion: The use of natural soil amendment in addition to preventing soil contamination, helps to improve soil structure to reduce evaporation. Overall, due to the highest effect of using 2% bentonite on significant decreasing of soil evaporation therefore, this soil amendment can be recommended to control of evaporation from soil.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Vermiculite
  • Bentonite
  • Zeolite
  • Evaporation
  • Soil Characteristic Moisture Curve
1.Abedi Kupai, J., and Sohrab, F. 2004. Effect of zeolite and bentonite minerals on soil hydraulic properties. Researches. Twelfth Iranian Conference on Crystallography and Mineralogy, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz. pp. 562-567.(In Persian)
2.Abedi Kupai, J., and Sohrab, F. 2004. Evaluation of the effect of application of superabsorbent polymers on storage capacity and water potential on three types of soil texture. Journal of Polymer Science and Technology. 17: 3. 163-173.
3.Abedi Kupai, J., and Mesfroush, M.2007. Evaluation of the applicationof superabsorbent polymer on the performance and storage of nutrients in greenhouse cucumber. Proceedings of the first technical workshop on improving water use efficiency by cultivating greenhouse crops, October 21, Tehran. (In Persian)
4.Abollino, O., Giacomino, A., Malandrino, M., and Mentasti, E. 2007. The efficiency of vermiculite as natural sorbent for heavy metals. Application to a contaminated soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 181: 1-4. 149-160.
5.Abu-Hamdeh, N.H. 2004. The effect of tillage treatments on soil water holding capacity and on soil physical properties. In Conserving soil and water for society: sharing solutions. ISCO 13th international soil conservation organization conference, Brisbane Australia. 669: 1-6.
6.Alizadeh, A. 1995. Principles of design of irrigation systems. Astan Quds Razavi Publications, 520p. (In Persian)
7.Allah Dadi, A., Moazen Ghamsari, B., Akbari, G.H., and Zohoorian Mehr, M. 2005. Investigation of the effect of different amount of water super absorbent polymer 200-A and irrigation levels on growth and yield of forage corn. In Proceedings of 3rd specific symposium on application of super absorbentpolymer hydro gels in agriculture. Petrochemistry and Polymer Research Center Iran. (In Persian)
8.Choudhary, M.I., Shalaby, A.A., and Al‐Omran, A.M. 1995. Water holding capacity and evaporation of calcareous soils as affected by four synthetic polymers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 26: 13-14. 2205-2215.
9.Delta-T Devices. 2016. User Manual for the SM150T, Soil Moisture Sensor. Cambridge, UK.
10.Din Pajooh, Y., and Jahanbakhsh, S. 2008. Evapotranspiration of reference plant in Iran using Hargreaves method. Proceedings of the Third Iranian Water Resources Management Conference, October 14-16, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)
11.Fu, L.H., Cao, T.H., Lei, Z.W.,Chen, H., Shi, Y.G., and Xu, C. 2016. Superabsorbent nanocomposite based on methyl acrylic acid-modified bentonite and sodium polyacrylate: Fabrication, structure and water uptake. Materials & Design. 94: 322-329.
12.Ghazavi, R., Omidvar, A., and Jeyhouni Naini, H. 2019. Investigation of the effect of zeolite on the coefficients of soil moisture curve models in sandy and loamy textures, Journal of Soil and Water Sciences. 23: 3. (In Persian)
13.Hussam, M., and Chloe, M. 2014. Maintenance of soil moisture by superabsorbent and its effect on yield and consumption of tomato juice. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research. 21: 2. (In Persian)
14.Jazbi, Z., Hojjati, M., and Kasraian, A. 2017. Fabrication and study of acrylamide / acrylic acid / bentonite superabsorbent nanocomposites for agricultural soils with different salinity. Oil Research. 98p. (In Persian)
15.Judy, Z., and Movahedi Naeini, A. 2007. Effect of Zeolite, Leica and Compost Modifiers on Soil Moisture Storage and Evaporation. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources. 14: 2. (In Persian)
16.Kocakuşak, S., Savaşcı, Ö., T ve Ayok, T. 2001. Doğal Zeolitler ve Uygulama Alanları. TÜBİTAK MAM, Malzeme ve Kimya Tek. Arş. Enst., KM 362.
17.Kouchaki, A., and Alizadeh, A. 1986. Principles of agriculture in arid areas. Astan Quds Razavi Publications, 270p. (In Persian)
18.Li, L., Zhou, X., Li, Y., Gong, C., Lu, L., Fu, X., and Tao, W. 2017. Water absorption and water/fertilizer retention performance of vermiculite modified sulphoaluminate cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials. 137: 224-233.
19.Lin, B.B. 2010. The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150: 4. 510-518.
20.Meshkat, M., Warner, R.C., and Workman, S.R. 2000. Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface drip and sand tube irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE. 43: 1. 79-86.
21.Monica, N., Frans, W.B., and Fosso-Kankeu, E. 2014. Adsorption potential of bentonite and attapulgite clays applied for the desalination of sea water. 6th Int'l Conf. on Green Technology, Renewable Energy & Environmental Engg. 27-28 Nov. Cape Town (SA).
22.Paradelo, R., Basanta, R., and Barral, M.T. 2019. Water-holding capacity and plant growth in compost-based substrates modified with polyacrylamide, guar gum or bentonite. Scientia horticulturae.243: 344-349.
23.Polat, E., Karaca, M., Demir, H., and Onus, A.N. 2004. Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. Journal of fruit and ornamental plant research,12: 1. 183-189.
24.Rahimpour, A., Besharat, S., and Rezaei, H. 2008. Use of GIS in estimating evapotranspiration by Presley-Taylor method in Nazlochai basin. Proceedings of the Third Iranian Water Resources Management Conference, October 23-25, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)
25.Ramesh, K., and Reddy, D.D. 2011. Zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture. Advances in agronomy. 113: 219-241.
26.Rashed Mohasel, M.H., and Kouchaki, A. 1997. Principles and operations of demining. University Jihad Publications Mashhad University, 200p. (In Persian)
27.Rosales, M.A., Ocampo, E., Rodríguez-Valentín, R., Olvera-Carrillo, Y., Acosta-Gallegos, J., and Covarrubias, A.A. 2012. Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant physiology and biochemistry. 56: 24-34.
28.Saremi, M., Farhadi, B., Maleki, A., and Farasati, M. 2015. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of lentil in Khorramabad. Journal of Plant Production Research. 22: 3. 337-342. (In Persian)
29.Shahraki, F., Emami, H., Fotovat, A., and Astaraei, A. 2016. The effect of modifiers on soil evaporation and soil moisture in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 2: 252-261. (In Persian)
30.Shirzad Adeh, H., Pasha, M., and Tajbakhsh, M. 2018. The effect of perlite, vermicompost and aquazorb on reducing the effect of drought stress on dual-purpose maize 678, Journal of Crop Ecology. 14: 1. 21-31. (In Persian)
31.Stejskal, M. 1996. Mining and Treatment of Silicate. (In Czech). Silikatavy Svaz, Praha, 443p.
32.Szerement, J., Ambrożewicz-Nita, A., Kędziora, K., and Piasek, J. 2014. Use of zeolite in agriculture and environmental protection. A short review. Bulletin of the National Polytechnic University of Lviv. 781: 172-177.
33.Valizadeh Ghaleh Beyg, A., Nemati, H., Tehraniifar, A., and Emami, H. 2015. The effect of 200-A superabsorbent and bentonite and drought stress on physiological traits and vitamin C of lettuce in greenhouse cultivation conditions. Science and Technology of Greenhouse Cultivation. (In Persian)
34.Xiubin, H., and Zhanbin, H. 2001. Zeolite application for enhancing water infiltration and retention in loess soil. Res Conservation and Recycling. 34: 45-52.
35.Yasuda, H., Takuma, K., Mizuta, N., and Nishide, H. 1995. Water retention variety of dune sand due to zeolite addition. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture. Tottori University. 48: 27-34.
36.Yuan, C., Lei, T., Mao, L., Liu, H., and Wu, Y. 2009. Soil surface evaporation processes under mulches of different sized gravel. Catena. 78: 2. 117-121.